From: <gregkh@suse.de>
To: aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, cmm@us.ibm.com,
dev@jaysonking.com, gregkh@suse.de, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
tytso@mit.edu
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: patch ext4-add-percpu-dirty-block-accounting.patch added to 2.6.27-stable tree
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:26:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12716980071820@kroah.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268699165-17461-5-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled
Subject: ext4: Add percpu dirty block accounting.
to the 2.6.27-stable tree. Its filename is
ext4-add-percpu-dirty-block-accounting.patch
A git repo of this tree can be found at
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
>From tytso@mit.edu Mon Apr 19 10:21:01 2010
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:25:58 -0400
Subject: ext4: Add percpu dirty block accounting.
To: stable@kernel.org
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>, "Jayson R. King" <dev@jaysonking.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <1268699165-17461-5-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit 6bc6e63fcd7dac9e633ea29f1fddd9580ab28f3f upstream.
This patch adds dirty block accounting using percpu_counters. Delayed
allocation block reservation is now done by updating dirty block
counter. In a later patch we switch to non delalloc mode if the
filesystem free blocks is greater than 150% of total filesystem dirty
blocks
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao<cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jayson R. King <dev@jaysonking.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
fs/ext4/balloc.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
fs/ext4/ext4_sb.h | 1
fs/ext4/inode.c | 22 +++++++++----------
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 31 ++++++++++++---------------
fs/ext4/super.c | 8 ++++++
5 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -1757,26 +1757,38 @@ out:
int ext4_claim_free_blocks(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi,
ext4_fsblk_t nblocks)
{
- s64 free_blocks;
+ s64 free_blocks, dirty_blocks;
ext4_fsblk_t root_blocks = 0;
struct percpu_counter *fbc = &sbi->s_freeblocks_counter;
+ struct percpu_counter *dbc = &sbi->s_dirtyblocks_counter;
- free_blocks = percpu_counter_read(fbc);
+ free_blocks = percpu_counter_read_positive(fbc);
+ dirty_blocks = percpu_counter_read_positive(dbc);
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) &&
sbi->s_resuid != current->fsuid &&
(sbi->s_resgid == 0 || !in_group_p(sbi->s_resgid)))
root_blocks = ext4_r_blocks_count(sbi->s_es);
- if (free_blocks - (nblocks + root_blocks) < EXT4_FREEBLOCKS_WATERMARK)
- free_blocks = percpu_counter_sum(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
-
- if (free_blocks < (root_blocks + nblocks))
+ if (free_blocks - (nblocks + root_blocks + dirty_blocks) <
+ EXT4_FREEBLOCKS_WATERMARK) {
+ free_blocks = percpu_counter_sum(fbc);
+ dirty_blocks = percpu_counter_sum(dbc);
+ if (dirty_blocks < 0) {
+ printk(KERN_CRIT "Dirty block accounting "
+ "went wrong %lld\n",
+ dirty_blocks);
+ }
+ }
+ /* Check whether we have space after
+ * accounting for current dirty blocks
+ */
+ if (free_blocks < ((s64)(root_blocks + nblocks) + dirty_blocks))
/* we don't have free space */
return -ENOSPC;
- /* reduce fs free blocks counter */
- percpu_counter_sub(fbc, nblocks);
+ /* Add the blocks to nblocks */
+ percpu_counter_add(dbc, nblocks);
return 0;
}
@@ -1792,23 +1804,28 @@ int ext4_claim_free_blocks(struct ext4_s
ext4_fsblk_t ext4_has_free_blocks(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi,
ext4_fsblk_t nblocks)
{
- ext4_fsblk_t free_blocks;
+ ext4_fsblk_t free_blocks, dirty_blocks;
ext4_fsblk_t root_blocks = 0;
+ struct percpu_counter *fbc = &sbi->s_freeblocks_counter;
+ struct percpu_counter *dbc = &sbi->s_dirtyblocks_counter;
- free_blocks = percpu_counter_read_positive(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
+ free_blocks = percpu_counter_read_positive(fbc);
+ dirty_blocks = percpu_counter_read_positive(dbc);
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) &&
sbi->s_resuid != current->fsuid &&
(sbi->s_resgid == 0 || !in_group_p(sbi->s_resgid)))
root_blocks = ext4_r_blocks_count(sbi->s_es);
- if (free_blocks - (nblocks + root_blocks) < EXT4_FREEBLOCKS_WATERMARK)
- free_blocks = percpu_counter_sum_positive(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
-
- if (free_blocks <= root_blocks)
+ if (free_blocks - (nblocks + root_blocks + dirty_blocks) <
+ EXT4_FREEBLOCKS_WATERMARK) {
+ free_blocks = percpu_counter_sum_positive(fbc);
+ dirty_blocks = percpu_counter_sum_positive(dbc);
+ }
+ if (free_blocks <= (root_blocks + dirty_blocks))
/* we don't have free space */
return 0;
- if (free_blocks - root_blocks < nblocks)
+ if (free_blocks - (root_blocks + dirty_blocks) < nblocks)
return free_blocks - root_blocks;
return nblocks;
}
@@ -2089,13 +2106,14 @@ allocated:
le16_add_cpu(&gdp->bg_free_blocks_count, -num);
gdp->bg_checksum = ext4_group_desc_csum(sbi, group_no, gdp);
spin_unlock(sb_bgl_lock(sbi, group_no));
- if (!EXT4_I(inode)->i_delalloc_reserved_flag && (*count != num)) {
- /*
- * we allocated less blocks than we
- * claimed. Add the difference back.
- */
- percpu_counter_add(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter, *count - num);
- }
+ percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter, num);
+ /*
+ * Now reduce the dirty block count also. Should not go negative
+ */
+ if (!EXT4_I(inode)->i_delalloc_reserved_flag)
+ percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_dirtyblocks_counter, *count);
+ else
+ percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_dirtyblocks_counter, num);
if (sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex) {
ext4_group_t flex_group = ext4_flex_group(sbi, group_no);
spin_lock(sb_bgl_lock(sbi, flex_group));
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4_sb.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_sb.h
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
struct percpu_counter s_freeblocks_counter;
struct percpu_counter s_freeinodes_counter;
struct percpu_counter s_dirs_counter;
+ struct percpu_counter s_dirtyblocks_counter;
struct blockgroup_lock s_blockgroup_lock;
/* root of the per fs reservation window tree */
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1032,19 +1032,20 @@ static void ext4_da_update_reserve_space
BUG_ON(mdb > EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_meta_blocks);
mdb_free = EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_meta_blocks - mdb;
- /* Account for allocated meta_blocks */
- mdb_free -= EXT4_I(inode)->i_allocated_meta_blocks;
-
- /* update fs free blocks counter for truncate case */
- percpu_counter_add(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter, mdb_free);
+ if (mdb_free) {
+ /* Account for allocated meta_blocks */
+ mdb_free -= EXT4_I(inode)->i_allocated_meta_blocks;
+
+ /* update fs dirty blocks counter */
+ percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_dirtyblocks_counter, mdb_free);
+ EXT4_I(inode)->i_allocated_meta_blocks = 0;
+ EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_meta_blocks = mdb;
+ }
/* update per-inode reservations */
BUG_ON(used > EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks);
EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks -= used;
- BUG_ON(mdb > EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_meta_blocks);
- EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_meta_blocks = mdb;
- EXT4_I(inode)->i_allocated_meta_blocks = 0;
spin_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock);
/*
@@ -1609,8 +1610,8 @@ static void ext4_da_release_space(struct
release = to_free + mdb_free;
- /* update fs free blocks counter for truncate case */
- percpu_counter_add(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter, release);
+ /* update fs dirty blocks counter for truncate case */
+ percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_dirtyblocks_counter, release);
/* update per-inode reservations */
BUG_ON(to_free > EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks);
@@ -2546,7 +2547,6 @@ static int ext4_da_write_begin(struct fi
index = pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
from = pos & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
to = from + len;
-
retry:
/*
* With delayed allocation, we don't log the i_disksize update
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3100,7 +3100,7 @@ void exit_ext4_mballoc(void)
*/
static noinline_for_stack int
ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
- handle_t *handle)
+ handle_t *handle, unsigned long reserv_blks)
{
struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh = NULL;
struct ext4_super_block *es;
@@ -3188,21 +3188,16 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_
le16_add_cpu(&gdp->bg_free_blocks_count, -ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len);
gdp->bg_checksum = ext4_group_desc_csum(sbi, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group, gdp);
spin_unlock(sb_bgl_lock(sbi, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group));
-
+ percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len);
/*
- * free blocks account has already be reduced/reserved
- * at write_begin() time for delayed allocation
- * do not double accounting
+ * Now reduce the dirty block count also. Should not go negative
*/
- if (!(ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_DELALLOC_RESERVED) &&
- ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len != ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len) {
- /*
- * we allocated less blocks than we calimed
- * Add the difference back
- */
- percpu_counter_add(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter,
- ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len - ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len);
- }
+ if (!(ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_DELALLOC_RESERVED))
+ /* release all the reserved blocks if non delalloc */
+ percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_dirtyblocks_counter, reserv_blks);
+ else
+ percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_dirtyblocks_counter,
+ ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len);
if (sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex) {
ext4_group_t flex_group = ext4_flex_group(sbi,
@@ -4636,12 +4631,13 @@ static int ext4_mb_discard_preallocation
ext4_fsblk_t ext4_mb_new_blocks(handle_t *handle,
struct ext4_allocation_request *ar, int *errp)
{
+ int freed;
struct ext4_allocation_context *ac = NULL;
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi;
struct super_block *sb;
ext4_fsblk_t block = 0;
- int freed;
- int inquota;
+ unsigned long inquota;
+ unsigned long reserv_blks = 0;
sb = ar->inode->i_sb;
sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
@@ -4659,6 +4655,7 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_mb_new_blocks(handle_t
*errp = -ENOSPC;
return 0;
}
+ reserv_blks = ar->len;
}
while (ar->len && DQUOT_ALLOC_BLOCK(ar->inode, ar->len)) {
ar->flags |= EXT4_MB_HINT_NOPREALLOC;
@@ -4704,7 +4701,7 @@ repeat:
ext4_mb_new_preallocation(ac);
}
if (likely(ac->ac_status == AC_STATUS_FOUND)) {
- *errp = ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(ac, handle);
+ *errp = ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(ac, handle, reserv_blks);
if (*errp == -EAGAIN) {
/*
* drop the reference that we took
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -521,6 +521,7 @@ static void ext4_put_super(struct super_
percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->s_freeinodes_counter);
percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->s_dirs_counter);
+ percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->s_dirtyblocks_counter);
brelse(sbi->s_sbh);
#ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
for (i = 0; i < MAXQUOTAS; i++)
@@ -2280,6 +2281,9 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_
err = percpu_counter_init(&sbi->s_dirs_counter,
ext4_count_dirs(sb));
}
+ if (!err) {
+ err = percpu_counter_init(&sbi->s_dirtyblocks_counter, 0);
+ }
if (err) {
printk(KERN_ERR "EXT4-fs: insufficient memory\n");
goto failed_mount3;
@@ -2517,6 +2521,7 @@ failed_mount3:
percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->s_freeinodes_counter);
percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->s_dirs_counter);
+ percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->s_dirtyblocks_counter);
failed_mount2:
for (i = 0; i < db_count; i++)
brelse(sbi->s_group_desc[i]);
@@ -3208,7 +3213,8 @@ static int ext4_statfs(struct dentry *de
buf->f_type = EXT4_SUPER_MAGIC;
buf->f_bsize = sb->s_blocksize;
buf->f_blocks = ext4_blocks_count(es) - sbi->s_overhead_last;
- buf->f_bfree = percpu_counter_sum_positive(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
+ buf->f_bfree = percpu_counter_sum_positive(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter) -
+ percpu_counter_sum_positive(&sbi->s_dirtyblocks_counter);
ext4_free_blocks_count_set(es, buf->f_bfree);
buf->f_bavail = buf->f_bfree - ext4_r_blocks_count(es);
if (buf->f_bfree < ext4_r_blocks_count(es))
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
queue-2.6.27/ext4-fix-file-fragmentation-during-large-file-write.patch
queue-2.6.27/ext4-retry-block-allocation-if-we-have-free-blocks-left.patch
queue-2.6.27/vfs-add-no_nrwrite_index_update-writeback-control-flag.patch
queue-2.6.27/ext4-retry-block-reservation.patch
queue-2.6.27/ext4-invalidate-pages-if-delalloc-block-allocation-fails.patch
queue-2.6.27/ext4-use-tag-dirty-lookup-during-mpage_da_submit_io.patch
queue-2.6.27/vfs-remove-the-range_cont-writeback-mode.patch
queue-2.6.27/ext4-make-sure-all-the-block-allocation-paths-reserve-blocks.patch
queue-2.6.27/ext4-implement-range_cyclic-in-ext4_da_writepages-instead-of-write_cache_pages.patch
queue-2.6.27/ext4-add-percpu-dirty-block-accounting.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-19 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-16 0:25 [PATCH 2.6.27.y 00/11] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Theodore Ts'o
2010-03-16 0:25 ` [PATCH 2.6.27.y 01/11] ext4: invalidate pages if delalloc block allocation fails Theodore Ts'o
2010-04-19 17:26 ` patch ext4-invalidate-pages-if-delalloc-block-allocation-fails.patch added to 2.6.27-stable tree gregkh
2010-03-16 0:25 ` [PATCH 2.6.27.y 02/11] percpu counter: clean up percpu_counter_sum_and_set() Theodore Ts'o
2010-04-19 17:27 ` patch percpu-counter-clean-up-percpu_counter_sum_and_set.patch added to 2.6.27-stable tree gregkh
2010-03-16 0:25 ` [PATCH 2.6.27.y 03/11] ext4: Make sure all the block allocation paths reserve blocks Theodore Ts'o
2010-04-19 17:26 ` patch ext4-make-sure-all-the-block-allocation-paths-reserve-blocks.patch added to 2.6.27-stable tree gregkh
2010-03-16 0:25 ` [PATCH 2.6.27.y 04/11] ext4: Add percpu dirty block accounting Theodore Ts'o
2010-03-16 18:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-03-17 0:51 ` tytso
2010-04-19 17:26 ` gregkh [this message]
2010-03-16 0:25 ` [PATCH 2.6.27.y 05/11] ext4: Retry block reservation Theodore Ts'o
2010-04-19 17:27 ` patch ext4-retry-block-reservation.patch added to 2.6.27-stable tree gregkh
2010-03-16 0:26 ` [PATCH 2.6.27.y 06/11] ext4: Retry block allocation if we have free blocks left Theodore Ts'o
2010-04-19 17:26 ` patch ext4-retry-block-allocation-if-we-have-free-blocks-left.patch added to 2.6.27-stable tree gregkh
2010-03-16 0:26 ` [PATCH 2.6.27.y 07/11] ext4: Use tag dirty lookup during mpage_da_submit_io Theodore Ts'o
2010-04-19 17:27 ` patch ext4-use-tag-dirty-lookup-during-mpage_da_submit_io.patch added to 2.6.27-stable tree gregkh
2010-03-16 0:26 ` [PATCH 2.6.27.y 08/11] vfs: Remove the range_cont writeback mode Theodore Ts'o
2010-04-19 17:27 ` patch vfs-remove-the-range_cont-writeback-mode.patch added to 2.6.27-stable tree gregkh
2010-03-16 0:26 ` [PATCH 2.6.27.y 09/11] vfs: Add no_nrwrite_index_update writeback control flag Theodore Ts'o
2010-04-19 17:27 ` patch vfs-add-no_nrwrite_index_update-writeback-control-flag.patch added to 2.6.27-stable tree gregkh
2010-03-16 0:26 ` [PATCH 2.6.27.y 10/11] ext4: Fix file fragmentation during large file write Theodore Ts'o
2010-04-19 17:26 ` patch ext4-fix-file-fragmentation-during-large-file-write.patch added to 2.6.27-stable tree gregkh
2010-03-16 0:26 ` [PATCH 2.6.27.y 11/11] ext4: Implement range_cyclic in ext4_da_writepages instead of write_cache_pages Theodore Ts'o
2010-04-19 17:26 ` patch ext4-implement-range_cyclic-in-ext4_da_writepages-instead-of-write_cache_pages.patch added to 2.6.27-stable tree gregkh
2010-03-17 3:10 ` [PATCH 2.6.27.y 00/11] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Jayson R. King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12716980071820@kroah.org \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dev@jaysonking.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.