From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phillip Susi Subject: Re: Use of WD20EARS with MDADM Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:49:12 -0400 Message-ID: <1271994552.2855.25.camel@faldara> References: <4BAB8D41.4010801@gmail.com> <4BCF4693.3020101@buttersideup.com> <201004221913.50692.eye.of.the.8eholder@gmail.com> <4BD0A716.4080909@cfl.rr.com> <4BD0E3B9.5090504@sauce.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BD0E3B9.5090504@sauce.co.nz> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Scobie Cc: Mark Knecht , Khelben Blackstaff , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 12:03 +1200, Richard Scobie wrote: > "Each drive is put through extended burn-in testing with thermal cycling > to ensure reliable operation." > > Which presumably helps weed out infant mortality cases. It is also > interesting to note that while all the RE series drives have a spindle > support bearing at both ends, only the 2TB desktop drive does. Indeed. Pretty standard manufacturing process to weed out the infant mortality. Interesting to find out that they don't bother with these drives. That might explain why my first one died after ~24 hours of operation. What still pisses me off is that it died so hard my bios wouldn't even post with the thing plugged in, let alone let me read any SMART data from it.