From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Clifton Subject: Re: [PATCH] Graphics corruption issues Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:19:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1272237592.5170.2.camel@pcjc2lap> References: <1271960341.13316.2.camel@pcjc2lap> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.152]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14AF9E732 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:19:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org To: Alexander Lam , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 18:54 -0400, Alexander Lam wrote: > Oh my bad. *facepalm* > I didn't see that you had already posted them inline. They were attached, with a suggested viewing hint of inline - so I think your original comment was correct. I'm not familiar with how to send mails straight from git, and I thought non-attached versions of the patch pasted into my mail client (evolution) would be more likely to produce a corrupt patch, munging tabs, spaces etc.. Thanks for your comments and testing though. I'm not entirely sure if returning FALSE when pixman can't do a blit is sufficient, but it "seems to help" here. Perhaps Chris can comment. -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)