From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] net/bonding: bonding and LACP fixes Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 14:19:35 +0100 Message-ID: <12727792.atY1H55HMS@xps13> References: <1470084176-79932-1-git-send-email-rsanford@akamai.com> <4165301.beBZTnGUrx@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com To: Robert Sanford Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB7C2B8C for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:19:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id v186so139100608wmd.0 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 05:19:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4165301.beBZTnGUrx@xps13> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2017-02-08 18:14, Thomas Monjalon: > 2016-08-01 16:42, Robert Sanford: > > In this patch series, we fix two bonding driver bugs and > > enhance testpmd so that bonding mode 4 (LACP) ports remain > > operational even when idle. > > These patches are blocked because we are waiting a v2. > > Waiting so long for a fix without having any feedback makes me think > that either the bug is not so important or the PMD is not used. Last call: anyone interested in this series?