From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O9Md1-0004gm-BT for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 04 May 2010 20:13:56 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o44IA8kb028815 for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 19:10:08 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 28469-06 for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 19:10:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o44IA2F3028802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 19:10:03 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <1272905195.2931.0.camel@trini-m4400> References: <1270135981.4993.128.camel@rex> <1271087957.29304.86.camel@trini-m4400> <1271090799.14344.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1272756595.30647.1942.camel@rex> <1272905195.2931.0.camel@trini-m4400> Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 19:10:01 +0100 Message-ID: <1272996601.1355.5.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 93.97.173.237 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rpurdie@rpsys.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC, TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Request for branch merge X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 18:13:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 09:46 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 00:29 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 17:46 +0100, Joshua Lock wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 08:59 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 10:37 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > > > Joshuas last 3 commits to poky seem to fix Toms issue with binconfig and > > > > > my issue with chrpath, which only leaves the cross staging lamangler > > > > > stuff to get fixed. > > > > > > > > Actually (and I'm OK with binconfig stuff being broken in the first > > > > merge) the problem with binconfig junk isn't the file contents, but the > > > > file location. staging-target-pkg will contain > > > > staging//usr/bin//foo-config. Which means using pstaging > > > > for a target pkg built on 32bit Linux fails when used on 64bit Linux. > > > > Not that I wouldn't mind seeing the binconfig stuff die, just saying > > > > it's a problem today :) > > > > > > Ah, hmm... yes. That is a problem. > > > > > > FWIW I don't think you'll get any arguments from the Poky team where the > > > binconfig stuff to suffer an untimely demise! > > > > FWIW, Poky has had some interesting commits recently that address Tom's > > issue above from Josh. > > Interesting. When you killed CROSS_*, did you rework stuff so that gcc > & co's sysroot stuff works automatically or no? Can't tell off-hand. What do you mean by "works automatically"? Cheers, Richard