From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755202Ab0ELNkb (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 09:40:31 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:53850 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753447Ab0ELNka (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 09:40:30 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets From: Peter Zijlstra To: Dhaval Giani Cc: menage@google.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lennart@poettering.net, jsafrane@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1273669541.3086.24.camel@localhost> References: <1273669541.3086.24.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 15:40:27 +0200 Message-ID: <1273671627.1626.116.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 15:05 +0200, Dhaval Giani wrote: > Where cpusets goes wrong is to have a *no* default values. It has a default, empty is still a valid value.