From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: pacman@kosh.dhis.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: "event-scan failed" logflood
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 07:28:24 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273786104.21352.190.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100513111603.3352.qmail@kosh.dhis.org>
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 06:16 -0500, pacman@kosh.dhis.org wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> >
> > Well, first it should be called once per second, not 60 times per
> > second, so something is wrong there...
>
> Actually I think it was happening a lot more than 60 times per second, and
> klogd was losing most of the messages because they came too fast. When
> running the new kernel, vmstat shows 170000 context switches per second (and
> CPU usage never going below 5%) even when everything should be idle.
>
> My next experiment was to hack rtas_init to return 0 unconditionally. Now
> everything still runs fine, and the context switches per second are back down
> in the 2-digit range.
>
> >
> > Then, it wouldn't surprise me if the Pegasos RTAS didn't implement
> > the event scan properly. Maybe we failed silently before that ? I
> > doubt it's necessary there anyways.
>
> If I'm reading things correctly, rtas-event-scan-rate is the key to the
> frequency of attempts. And rtasd.c didn't expect this:
>
> $ od -t x1 /proc/device-tree/rtas/rtas-event-scan-rate
> 0000000 00 00 00 00
> 0000004
Ok, that gives us a good thing to use to not do the scanning then. If
that's 0 then we assume it's a bogus OF and we disable the scan
completely. I'll do a patch later today, though feel free to beat me to
it.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-13 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-13 4:13 "event-scan failed" logflood pacman
2010-05-13 6:04 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-05-13 10:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-05-13 11:16 ` pacman
2010-05-13 21:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2010-05-17 12:58 ` nello martuscielli
2010-05-18 12:33 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-05-18 16:30 ` nello martuscielli
2010-05-19 1:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-06-11 13:32 ` acrux@cruxppc.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1273786104.21352.190.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=pacman@kosh.dhis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.