From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
James Kosin <jkosin@intcomgrp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, menage@google.com,
jsafrane@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 12:38:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273833535.1626.242.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100514081248.GE3296@balbir.in.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 13:42 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Heh! agreed, but we are a small population and moreover a large
> population would benefit from systemd and parallel boot.
CONFIG_CGROUP=y isn't a requirement for parallel boot. People have been
doing that for years without it.
And I'm not against systemd using cgroups per-se, I'm against it
mandating it. It could simply not use them and not provide whatever it
needs them for when not present.
CONFIG_CGROUP is an option, so people can say no.
Same for CONFIG_SYSFS, udev gets highly unhappy when disabled, but init
still works and you do get a shell of some sort. If you pre-populate
your /dev with static device nodes you can actually make it all the way
to runlevel 3 the last time I tried.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-14 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <eJjRf-6YM-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <eJktY-7JG-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <eJktY-7JG-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2010-05-12 14:11 ` [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets James Kosin
2010-05-12 14:13 ` Dhaval Giani
2010-05-12 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-12 14:22 ` Dhaval Giani
2010-05-12 14:40 ` Jan Safranek
[not found] ` <4BEAE7A1.2010001@intcomgrp.com>
2010-05-12 17:42 ` Dhaval Giani
2010-05-12 17:58 ` James Kosin
2010-05-12 18:04 ` Chris Friesen
2010-05-12 18:27 ` Balbir Singh
2010-05-12 19:07 ` Lennart Poettering
2010-05-13 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-13 14:03 ` Lennart Poettering
2010-05-13 20:06 ` Paul Menage
2010-05-13 20:36 ` Lennart Poettering
2010-05-13 20:41 ` Lennart Poettering
2010-05-13 21:07 ` Balbir Singh
2010-05-13 23:55 ` Lennart Poettering
2010-05-14 5:44 ` Balbir Singh
2010-05-14 6:34 ` Dhaval Giani
2010-05-13 21:29 ` Paul Menage
2010-05-13 21:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-14 0:02 ` Lennart Poettering
2010-05-14 5:43 ` Balbir Singh
2010-05-14 6:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-14 8:12 ` Balbir Singh
2010-05-14 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-05-14 11:57 ` Dhaval Giani
2010-05-14 16:07 ` Lennart Poettering
2010-05-14 6:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-14 7:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-14 8:11 ` Balbir Singh
2010-05-12 13:05 Dhaval Giani
2010-05-12 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-12 13:46 ` Dhaval Giani
2010-05-12 19:01 ` Paul Menage
2010-05-12 19:10 ` Dhaval Giani
2010-05-12 19:20 ` Paul Menage
2010-05-12 19:29 ` Dhaval Giani
2010-05-12 19:36 ` Paul Menage
2010-05-12 19:39 ` Balbir Singh
2010-05-12 19:59 ` Dhaval Giani
2010-05-13 10:26 ` Dhaval Giani
2010-05-13 10:52 ` Balbir Singh
2010-05-13 20:12 ` Paul Menage
2010-05-13 20:16 ` Dhaval Giani
2010-05-13 20:19 ` Dhaval Giani
2010-05-12 19:30 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1273833535.1626.242.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=jkosin@intcomgrp.com \
--cc=jsafrane@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mzxreary@0pointer.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.