From: Sundar R Iyer <sundar.iyer@stericsson.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
Deepak Sikri <deepak.sikri79@gmail.com>,
Viresh KUMAR <viresh.kumar@st.com>,
Rajeev KUMAR <rajeev-dlh.kumar@st.com>,
Armando VISCONTI <armando.visconti@st.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vipin KUMAR <vipin.kumar@st.com>,
Shiraz HASHIM <shiraz.hashim@st.com>,
"linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux <STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com>
Subject: RE: [linux-pm] Power Domain Framework
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:30:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1274162450.17303.35.camel@bnru01> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1274134636.2698.170.camel@finisterre.wolfsonmicro.main>
Hi,
> Yeah, sure - obviously, the generic concept of power domains is
> something that does exist within the off-SoC hardware, but on-SoC the
> end implementation is a bit different.
Exactly. This is what I can see if we can bridge this "a bit different".
True, I am dumb to miss out some points, but I think with more inputs,
more thinking, we can definitely make it generic!
Thinking out loud ( excuse me if this is dumb), At the end of the day,
how I see this benefiting a lay driver developer is : use the regulator
API for the appropriate power sources - your SoC domain, your external
regulator domain..etc..etc and ensure a very efficient (probably) run
time PM for your device. All that the Platform guy will do is iterate
a list of domains on the platform, provide hookups, ensure constraints
etc and the job is done. Even if the same IP is used on a different SoC,
you still ensure efficient savings in your driver itself.
> As I said in reply to the patch I am concerned that this may be an
> oversimplification relative to what general hardware needs.
Ohh. for the patch set, as I said, its only a primitive implementation.
With your inputs, we can definitely make it more efficient!
Regards,
Sundar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-18 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-10 13:46 Power Domain Framework Deepak Sikri
2010-05-10 14:05 ` [linux-pm] " Mark Brown
2010-05-16 11:13 ` Sundar
2010-05-16 11:13 ` [linux-pm] " Sundar
2010-05-17 3:16 ` Mark Brown
2010-05-17 3:16 ` [linux-pm] " Mark Brown
[not found] ` <AANLkTimDdBCnRFMDiUkuNKanOzuPNwCpfRv9Gsi03Lsy@mail.gmail.com>
2010-05-17 13:33 ` Fwd: " Sundar
2010-05-17 14:33 ` Fwd: " Mark Brown
2010-05-17 14:33 ` Fwd: [linux-pm] " Mark Brown
2010-05-17 16:23 ` Fwd: " Sundar
2010-05-17 16:23 ` Fwd: [linux-pm] " Sundar
2010-05-17 16:35 ` Sundar R Iyer
2010-05-17 17:04 ` Mark Brown
2010-05-17 17:45 ` Sundar R Iyer
2010-05-17 20:38 ` Linus WALLEIJ
2010-05-17 20:38 ` [linux-pm] " Linus WALLEIJ
2010-05-17 21:18 ` Mark Brown
2010-05-17 21:18 ` [linux-pm] " Mark Brown
2010-05-17 21:46 ` Linus WALLEIJ
2010-05-17 21:46 ` [linux-pm] " Linus WALLEIJ
2010-05-17 22:17 ` Mark Brown
2010-05-17 22:17 ` [linux-pm] " Mark Brown
2010-05-18 6:00 ` Sundar R Iyer
2010-05-18 6:00 ` Sundar R Iyer [this message]
2010-05-22 4:02 ` Sundar
2010-05-24 3:39 ` Mark Brown
2010-05-24 3:39 ` [linux-pm] " Mark Brown
2010-05-26 8:33 ` Sundar R IYER
2010-05-26 21:07 ` Mark Brown
2010-05-26 21:07 ` [linux-pm] " Mark Brown
2010-05-27 3:01 ` Paul Mundt
2010-05-27 3:01 ` [linux-pm] " Paul Mundt
2010-05-27 6:51 ` Mark Brown
2010-05-27 6:51 ` Mark Brown
2010-05-26 8:33 ` Sundar R IYER
2010-05-17 17:45 ` Sundar R Iyer
2010-05-17 17:04 ` Mark Brown
2010-05-17 16:35 ` Sundar R Iyer
2010-05-17 20:20 ` Fwd: " Mark Brown
2010-05-17 20:20 ` Fwd: [linux-pm] " Mark Brown
2010-05-17 13:33 ` Fwd: " Sundar
2010-05-10 14:05 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1274162450.17303.35.camel@bnru01 \
--to=sundar.iyer@stericsson.com \
--cc=STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com \
--cc=armando.visconti@st.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=deepak.sikri79@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rajeev-dlh.kumar@st.com \
--cc=shiraz.hashim@st.com \
--cc=vipin.kumar@st.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.