From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jamie@linuxuk.org (Jamie Bennett)
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 17:27:51 +0100
Subject: Boot interface for device trees on ARM
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil3vDAN4QIJJImk8MnQklisqFJq_RBc7c9VEZxl@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201005181054.32325.jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1005172341200.12758@xanadu.home>
	<AANLkTilJl9_NHiT1LITG7UbA9S7OYsnGMcDAsFEEx5Ob@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1005191055180.12758@xanadu.home>
	<20100519200819.GF1693@shareable.org>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1005191614580.12758@xanadu.home>
	<AANLkTil3vDAN4QIJJImk8MnQklisqFJq_RBc7c9VEZxl@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1274459271.2178.14.camel@zander>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 10:24 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> Wow, no responses for almost two days, does that mean consensus has
> been reached?

Consensus on device-tree enabled ARM hardware, surely not ;)

Regards,
Jamie.

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jamie Bennett <jamie@linuxuk.org>
Subject: Re: Boot interface for device trees on ARM
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 17:27:51 +0100
Message-ID: <1274459271.2178.14.camel@zander>
References: <201005181054.32325.jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1005172341200.12758@xanadu.home>
	<AANLkTilJl9_NHiT1LITG7UbA9S7OYsnGMcDAsFEEx5Ob@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1005191055180.12758@xanadu.home>
	<20100519200819.GF1693@shareable.org>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1005191614580.12758@xanadu.home>
	<AANLkTil3vDAN4QIJJImk8MnQklisqFJq_RBc7c9VEZxl@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil3vDAN4QIJJImk8MnQklisqFJq_RBc7c9VEZxl@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel>,
	<mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>,
	<mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org
Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org
To: John Rigby <jcrigby@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, nicolas.pitre@canonical.com, Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 10:24 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> Wow, no responses for almost two days, does that mean consensus has
> been reached?

Consensus on device-tree enabled ARM hardware, surely not ;)

Regards,
Jamie.