From: Microbit_Ubuntu <microbit@virginbroadband.com.au>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Buildroot 2010.05-rc3 released uClibc 0.9.30.1 patches missing ?
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 07:32:12 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1274995932.436.9.camel@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201005272319.54338.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Bonjour Yann, tout le monde,
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 23:19 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Kris, All,
>
> On Thursday 27 May 2010 23:11:17 Microbit_Ubuntu wrote:
> > I don;t know if I'm off base here, but I notice that rc3 does not have
> > the patches for uClibc 0.9.30.1 at toolchain/uClibc folder in the
> > tarball ?????
>
> Indeed, that because the 0.9.30.x that is used is .3, and .1 is not present
> in the version choice, in the menuconfig. See:
> toolchain/uClibc/Config.in at 40
>
> Regards,
> Yann E. MORIN.
>
Thanks for reviewing.
This might have sounded like a dumb question - as of course uClibc was
compiled by ct-ng...
I haven't yet compiled BR, am about to though. I saw uClibc 0.1.29
patches, so I thought "where's 0.9.30.1 ??".
I mean, if 0.9.30.3 is used, why bother with 0.9.29 patches ???
Oh well, false alarm in any case !!
The *biggest* problem so far I had was the fact that ct-ng-1.6.1 patches
uClibc 0.9.30.1 BUT does NOT apply the ARM sysdep patch.
I kept getting "invalid module format" on my target. A rebuild with
(indeed) "new" linuxthreads enabled in uClibc of the x-tools toolchain
fixed it after manually applying the sysdeps patch !!
I'll still reply to your other post as well.
Au revoir,
Kris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-27 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-27 12:43 [Buildroot] Buildroot 2010.05-rc3 released Peter Korsgaard
2010-05-27 18:58 ` Microbit_Ubuntu
2010-05-27 21:15 ` Yann E. MORIN
2010-05-27 21:51 ` Microbit_Ubuntu
2010-05-27 21:55 ` Microbit_Ubuntu
2010-05-28 20:20 ` Yann E. MORIN
2010-06-01 10:21 ` Microbit_Ubuntu
2010-06-01 10:57 ` Peter Korsgaard
2010-06-01 18:25 ` Microbit_Ubuntu
2010-06-01 20:21 ` Microbit_Ubuntu
2010-06-01 20:27 ` Yann E. MORIN
2010-05-28 0:49 ` Microbit_Ubuntu
2010-05-27 21:11 ` [Buildroot] Buildroot 2010.05-rc3 released uClibc 0.9.30.1 patches missing ? Microbit_Ubuntu
2010-05-27 21:19 ` Yann E. MORIN
2010-05-27 21:32 ` Microbit_Ubuntu [this message]
2010-05-28 12:44 ` Peter Korsgaard
2010-06-01 10:38 ` Microbit_Ubuntu
2010-06-01 11:00 ` Peter Korsgaard
2010-05-28 0:37 ` [Buildroot] Buildroot 2010.05-rc3 released :: 2 build errors - lockfile-progs & gdb Microbit_Ubuntu
2010-05-30 7:35 ` Peter Korsgaard
2010-06-01 10:23 ` Microbit_Ubuntu
2010-06-01 10:56 ` Peter Korsgaard
2010-06-01 18:30 ` Microbit_Ubuntu
2010-06-15 7:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1274995932.436.9.camel@ubuntu \
--to=microbit@virginbroadband.com.au \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.