From: Ray Morris <support@bettercgi.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Is it possible to bypass LVM and mount contained partition directly?
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:54:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275400469.25384.0@raydesk1.bettercgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim3bctwpuF8_dEKt_Y66cWn7SK2Zmg78S2Z4YHh@mail.gmail.com> (from romeo.theriault@maine.edu on Tue Jun 1 08:27:22 2010)
> I'll only be able to have one restore at a time happening,
> since almost all our linux vm's have the same named VG's
> and LV's
Fedora used to by default name the VG for every machine
volgroup001 or something like that. They then changed to
naming it after the machine, I believe. You are discovering
one of the reasons why having them all named the same is a
bad idea. When a SAN is involved, one can of course envision
several other problems limits on future usage. Your best course
of action may be to eliminate the root cause and rename the
source VGs.
--
Ray Morris
support@bettercgi.com
Strongbox - The next generation in site security:
http://www.bettercgi.com/strongbox/
Throttlebox - Intelligent Bandwidth Control
http://www.bettercgi.com/throttlebox/
Strongbox / Throttlebox affiliate program:
http://www.bettercgi.com/affiliates/user/register.php
On 06/01/2010 08:27:22 AM, Romeo Theriault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > �Can you restore these backups to another system? �Such as one
> designated to do this job?
>
> Yes, I've thought about this a bit too. The problem that I see with
> this is that I'll only be able to have one restore at a time
> happening, since almost all our linux vm's have the same named VG's
> and LV's and they are on read-only media so I wouldn't be able to
> rename them....
>
> I've going to have to keeping thinking about this one.
>
> Thanks for the pointers.
>
> Romeo
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-01 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-31 19:21 [linux-lvm] Is it possible to bypass LVM and mount contained partition directly? Romeo Theriault
2010-05-31 20:45 ` Ray Morris
2010-05-31 21:17 ` Hull, Brett (MSE)
2010-06-01 13:27 ` Romeo Theriault
2010-06-01 13:54 ` Ray Morris [this message]
2010-06-01 14:00 ` Romeo Theriault
2010-06-01 15:56 ` K. Richard Pixley
2010-06-01 13:23 ` Romeo Theriault
2010-06-02 9:15 ` Bryn M. Reeves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1275400469.25384.0@raydesk1.bettercgi.com \
--to=support@bettercgi.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.