From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Benjamin Subject: Re: rgw backports Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:22:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1276006469.22059372.1477362126674.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <57FF63DD.1090806@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.25]:57123 "EHLO mx4-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754734AbcJYCWJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:22:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <57FF63DD.1090806@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary Cc: Ceph Development Hi Loic, Sorry about the late response. Looks like you resolved the first two. Drilling into 3, does the lack of conditional -lldap obstruct automake build? Apparently not? Regards, Matt ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" > To: "Matt Benjamin" > Cc: "Ceph Development" > Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 6:37:17 AM > Subject: rgw backports > > Hi Matt, > > The following jewel backports > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17322 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17319 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17313 > > conflict when trying to cherry-pick them and I would appreciate your advice > on how to handle them. Should they be resolved or do you think the best > action is to try to backport the commits that could prevent the conflict ? > If you don't have an opinion it's also fine, I'll figure it out ;-) > > Cheers > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Matt Benjamin Red Hat, Inc. 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage tel. 734-707-0660 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309