From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Tom Lyon <pugs@cisco.com>
Cc: randy.dunlap@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, joro@8bytes.org,
hjk@linutronix.de, mst@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com,
gregkh@suse.de, aafabbri@cisco.com, scofeldm@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] VFIO driver: Non-privileged user level PCI drivers
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 22:50:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1278391805.5764.28.camel@x201> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c0eb470.1HMjondO00NIvFM6%pugs@cisco.com>
Hi Tom.
A few MSI issues below. Thanks,
Alex
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 14:21 -0700, Tom Lyon wrote:
> diff -uprN linux-2.6.34/drivers/vfio/vfio_pci_config.c vfio-linux-2.6.34/drivers/vfio/vfio_pci_config.c
> --- linux-2.6.34/drivers/vfio/vfio_pci_config.c 1969-12-31 16:00:00.000000000 -0800
> +++ vfio-linux-2.6.34/drivers/vfio/vfio_pci_config.c 2010-05-28 14:26:47.000000000 -0700
> +/*
> + * Lengths of PCI Config Capabilities
> + * 0 means unknown (but at least 4)
> + * FF means special/variable
> + */
> +static u8 pci_capability_length[] = {
> + [PCI_CAP_ID_BASIC] = 64, /* pci config header */
> + [PCI_CAP_ID_PM] = PCI_PM_SIZEOF,
> + [PCI_CAP_ID_AGP] = PCI_AGP_SIZEOF,
> + [PCI_CAP_ID_VPD] = 8,
> + [PCI_CAP_ID_SLOTID] = 4,
> + [PCI_CAP_ID_MSI] = 0xFF, /* 10, 14, or 24 */
I think this is actually 10, 14, 20, or 24.
> +static struct perm_bits pci_cap_msi_perm[] = {
> + { 0, 0, }, /* 0x00 MSI message control */
> + { 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, }, /* 0x04 MSI message address */
> + { 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF, }, /* 0x08 MSI message addr/data */
> + { 0x0000FFFF, 0x0000FFFF, }, /* 0x0c MSI message data */
> + { 0, 0xFFFFFFFF, }, /* 0x10 MSI mask bits */
> + { 0, 0xFFFFFFFF, }, /* 0x14 MSI pending bits */
> +};
Is there any reason for mask bits to have virtualized writes? I don't
think we can support all 4 MSI capability sizes with this one table. We
probably need a 32bit and 64bit version, then we can drop the mask,
pending, and reserved fields via the length.
> + if (len == 0xFF) {
> + switch (cap) {
> + case PCI_CAP_ID_MSI:
> + ret = pci_read_config_word(pdev,
> + pos + PCI_MSI_FLAGS, &flags);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + if (flags & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT)
> + /* per vec masking */
> + len = 24;
> + else if (flags & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT)
These aren't mutually exclusive features aiui.
> + /* 64 bit */
> + len = 14;
> + else
> + len = 10;
> + break;
This should probably be something like
len = 10;
if (flags & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT)
len += 10;
if (flags & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) {
/* set 64bit permission table */
len += 4;
} else
/* set 32bit permission table */
> diff -uprN linux-2.6.34/include/linux/vfio.h vfio-linux-2.6.34/include/linux/vfio.h
> --- linux-2.6.34/include/linux/vfio.h 1969-12-31 16:00:00.000000000 -0800
> +++ vfio-linux-2.6.34/include/linux/vfio.h 2010-06-07 12:20:06.000000000 -0700
> +/* request MSI interrupts; use given eventfd */
> +#define VFIO_EVENTFD_MSI _IOW(';', 105, int)
Any intention of supporting MSI multiple message capability? If so,
this might turn into the same interface as MSIX.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-06 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-08 21:21 [PATCH V2] VFIO driver: Non-privileged user level PCI drivers Tom Lyon
2010-06-08 21:41 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-06-09 12:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-06-08 21:45 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-06-08 22:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-06-08 23:54 ` Tom Lyon
2010-06-09 5:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-06-11 22:15 ` Tom Lyon
2010-06-13 10:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-06-17 21:14 ` Tom Lyon
2010-06-17 21:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-06-24 12:22 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-06-24 15:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-06-09 11:04 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-09 15:25 ` Greg KH
2010-06-09 16:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-06-10 17:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-11 1:58 ` Tom Lyon
2010-06-11 4:19 ` Greg KH
2010-06-11 4:56 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-30 6:14 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-30 13:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-06-30 14:00 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-30 22:17 ` Tom Lyon
2010-06-30 22:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-06-30 22:49 ` Tom Lyon
2010-07-01 4:16 ` Alex Williamson
2010-07-01 4:30 ` Tom Lyon
2010-07-01 5:16 ` Alex Williamson
2010-07-01 15:29 ` Alex Williamson
2010-07-01 15:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-07-01 15:48 ` Alex Williamson
2010-07-01 16:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-07-01 18:49 ` Tom Lyon
2010-07-06 4:50 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1278391805.5764.28.camel@x201 \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=aafabbri@cisco.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hjk@linutronix.de \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pugs@cisco.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=scofeldm@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.