From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: gowrishankar <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: 2.6.33.[56]-rt23: howto create repeatable explosion in wakeup_next_waiter()
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:45:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1278524729.7501.12.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C3497A0.8030807@us.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 08:05 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On 07/07/2010 07:31 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Yup, all better.
>
> So with this, the "volatile struct" patch isn't necessary?
Definitely no longer necessary.. on my box ;-)
-Mike
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-07 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-07 4:46 2.6.33.[56]-rt23: howto create repeatable explosion in wakeup_next_waiter() Mike Galbraith
2010-07-07 8:03 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-07-07 11:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-07-07 12:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-07-07 11:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-07-07 14:03 ` Darren Hart
2010-07-07 14:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-07-08 12:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-07-08 14:12 ` Darren Hart
2010-07-09 2:11 ` Darren Hart
2010-07-09 4:32 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <4C36CD83.6070809@us.ibm.com>
2010-07-09 8:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-07-09 13:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-07-09 14:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-07-09 16:35 ` Darren Hart
2010-07-09 19:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-07-09 20:05 ` Darren Hart
2010-07-13 8:03 ` [PATCH][RT] futex: protect against pi_blocked_on corruption during requeue PI Darren Hart
2010-07-13 9:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-07-13 10:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-07-13 11:52 ` [PATCH][RT] futex: protect against pi_blocked_on corruption during requeue PI -V2 Thomas Gleixner
2010-07-13 15:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-07-13 18:59 ` Darren Hart
2010-07-18 8:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-07-13 9:58 ` [PATCH][RT] futex: protect against pi_blocked_on corruption during requeue PI Thomas Gleixner
2010-07-07 14:11 ` 2.6.33.[56]-rt23: howto create repeatable explosion in wakeup_next_waiter() gowrishankar
2010-07-07 14:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-07-07 15:05 ` Darren Hart
2010-07-07 17:45 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1278524729.7501.12.camel@marge.simson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.