From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: "malattia@linux.it" <malattia@linux.it>
Cc: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] iASL patches in Debian
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:06:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1278626807.2164.17.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100708134928.GD1909@kamineko.org>
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 21:49 +0800, malattia@linux.it wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:49:24AM +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 06:07 +0800, malattia@linux.it wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:27:20PM -0700, Moore, Robert wrote:
> > > > If you'd like to get ambitious, run the ASLTS suite on the big-endian machines.
> > >
> > > I'll give it a go :)
> > > Is the one found in the meego git repository what I should try?
> >
> > Or acpica git repository (git://git.moblin.org/acpica)
> >
> > acpica/tests/aslts
>
> For now I only ran "Do 0 aslts" and the results are not too bad. I cleaned
> up the build logs a bit and here's the diff between sparc64 and x86_64:
Good. Thanks!
>
> --- /proc/self/fd/11 2010-07-08 22:33:25.614802828 +0900
> +++ /proc/self/fd/13 2010-07-08 22:33:25.614802828 +0900
> @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
> -Linux smetana 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Mon Jun 21 16:31:11 UTC 2010 sparc64 GNU/Linux
> +Linux caligola 2.6.34 #37 SMP PREEMPT Sat May 29 11:36:03 JST 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> Make-install all the provided test cases
> +install -d -m 775 ../../../../../../tmp/aml/20100528/nopt/32
> +install -d -m 775 ../../../../../../tmp/aml/20100528/nopt/64
> +install -d -m 775 ../../../../../../tmp/aml/20100528/opt/32
> +install -d -m 775 ../../../../../../tmp/aml/20100528/opt/64
> ASL Input: MAIN.asl - 78 lines, 1734433 bytes, 21705 keywords
> AML Output: bdemo.aml - 282587 bytes, 4188 named objects, 17517 executable opcodes
>
> @@ -90,11 +94,11 @@
>
> Compilation complete. 0 Errors, 83 Warnings, 18 Remarks, 0 Optimizations
> ASL Input: MAIN.asl - 62 lines, 962044 bytes, 20265 keywords
> -AML Output: oconst.aml - 255557 bytes, 862 named objects, 19403 executable opcodes
> +AML Output: oconst.aml - 255575 bytes, 862 named objects, 19403 executable opcodes
Why do the aml files have different size?
Is it caused by big/small endian?
Lin Ming
>
> Compilation complete. 0 Errors, 1852 Warnings, 18 Remarks, 7775 Optimizations
> ASL Input: MAIN.asl - 62 lines, 962044 bytes, 20265 keywords
> -AML Output: oconst.aml - 261267 bytes, 862 named objects, 19403 executable opcodes
> +AML Output: oconst.aml - 261272 bytes, 862 named objects, 19403 executable opcodes
>
> Compilation complete. 0 Errors, 83 Warnings, 18 Remarks, 7908 Optimizations
> ASL Input: MAIN.asl - 66 lines, 256106 bytes, 3194 keywords
> @@ -666,11 +670,11 @@
>
> Compilation complete. 0 Errors, 127 Warnings, 10 Remarks, 0 Optimizations
> ASL Input: MAIN.asl - 71 lines, 229960 bytes, 4885 keywords
> -AML Output: dynobj.aml - 57915 bytes, 599 named objects, 4286 executable opcodes
> +AML Output: dynobj.aml - 57916 bytes, 599 named objects, 4286 executable opcodes
>
> Compilation complete. 0 Errors, 129 Warnings, 10 Remarks, 2101 Optimizations
> ASL Input: MAIN.asl - 71 lines, 229960 bytes, 4885 keywords
> -AML Output: dynobj.aml - 57919 bytes, 599 named objects, 4286 executable opcodes
> +AML Output: dynobj.aml - 57920 bytes, 599 named objects, 4286 executable opcodes
>
> Compilation complete. 0 Errors, 127 Warnings, 10 Remarks, 2101 Optimizations
> ASL Input: MAIN.asl - 60 lines, 94913 bytes, 1410 keywords
>
> Looks like I have some more work to do ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-08 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-04 4:43 [patch 0/5] iASL patches in Debian malattia
2010-07-04 4:43 ` [patch 1/5] allow overriding only some of the CFLAGS malattia
2010-07-04 4:43 ` [patch 2/5] Small tweak to define uintptr_t and successfully build on debian/kfreebsd malattia
2010-07-04 4:43 ` [patch 3/5] Support compiling DSDT tables on big endian architectures malattia
2010-07-04 4:43 ` [patch 4/5] Add architectures that do not support unaligned access and fix aligment issues malattia
2010-07-04 4:43 ` [patch 5/5] Fix FTBFS on hurd-i386 malattia
2010-07-06 17:01 ` [patch 0/5] iASL patches in Debian Moore, Robert
2010-07-07 19:27 ` Moore, Robert
2010-07-07 22:07 ` malattia
2010-07-07 23:41 ` Moore, Robert
2010-07-08 13:41 ` malattia
2010-07-08 22:14 ` Lin Ming
2010-07-08 0:49 ` Lin Ming
2010-07-08 13:49 ` malattia
2010-07-08 22:06 ` Lin Ming [this message]
2010-07-08 14:40 ` malattia
2010-07-14 1:42 ` Lin Ming
2010-07-15 21:29 ` malattia
2010-07-08 14:44 ` Moore, Robert
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-05 1:01 [Devel] " Lin Ming
2010-07-05 1:01 ` Lin Ming
2010-07-05 11:49 [Devel] " malattia
2010-07-05 11:49 ` malattia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1278626807.2164.17.camel@localhost \
--to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=malattia@linux.it \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.