From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luciano Coelho Subject: Re: [PATCH iptables] extensions: libxt_rateest: fix bps options for iptables-save Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:14:36 +0300 Message-ID: <1279210476.1575.1.camel@powerslave> References: <1279209884-7172-1-git-send-email-luciano.coelho@nokia.com> <4C3F32FD.6050706@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org" To: ext Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233]:37479 "EHLO mgw-mx06.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933646Ab0GOQOl (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:14:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C3F32FD.6050706@trash.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 18:10 +0200, ext Patrick McHardy wrote: > Am 15.07.2010 18:04, schrieb Luciano Coelho: > > The output generated by the libxt_rateest extension for bps matches > > was wrong and could not be restored properly. This patch fixes this > > problem by using the correct options in the right order when saving > > the table. > > Applied, thanks. A quick question: do you apply this to iptables-next? Or iptables-next will only be aligned with master when you merge them (when the stuff included in iptables-next gets released in the kernel)? -- Cheers, Luca.