From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@nokia.com>
To: ext Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: ext Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
"netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org"
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] setting up throughput threshold indications to userspace
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:30:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279517423.7097.2.camel@powerslave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1007162127090.22666@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 21:27 +0200, ext Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Friday 2010-07-16 15:10, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> >> > There is one problem with this solution, which is that it works in a
> >> > per-connection basis (due to CONNMARK). This is not exactly what I
> >> > want. I need to have this on a per-ruleset basis. For that, I need to
> >> > have a MARK (variable?) which can be set independently of connections or
> >> > packets. This is similar to the proposed condition match, but what is
> >> > missing there is a way to set the condition with iptables itself,
> >> > without requiring the userspace to change the procfs file. This could
> >> > probably be achieved with a "CONDITION" target or something similar.
> >> > Any ideas?
> >>
> >> Sounds useful.
> >
> >Okay, this was the kind of confirmation I wanted before jumping into the
> >implementation. ;) I'll implement this target soon.
>
> My suggestion to have it combined with xt_condition.
Yes, I also think that is the best idea. I'll implement a CONDITION
target that will work together with the condition match. For now I'll
use the non-final version you submitted some time ago.
--
Cheers,
Luca.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-19 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-16 8:20 [RFC] setting up throughput threshold indications to userspace Luciano Coelho
2010-07-16 13:01 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-07-16 13:10 ` Luciano Coelho
2010-07-16 19:27 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-07-19 5:30 ` Luciano Coelho [this message]
2010-08-16 13:40 ` Luciano Coelho
2010-08-16 13:51 ` Changli Gao
2010-08-16 14:01 ` Luciano Coelho
2010-08-16 14:13 ` Changli Gao
2010-08-16 14:26 ` Luciano Coelho
2010-08-16 15:19 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-08-17 5:27 ` Luciano Coelho
2010-08-16 14:26 ` Changli Gao
2010-08-16 14:32 ` Luciano Coelho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1279517423.7097.2.camel@powerslave \
--to=luciano.coelho@nokia.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.