From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Brian Norris <norris@broadcom.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Improved BB Scanning
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:49:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279705759.2306.0.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C44A833.3010500@broadcom.com>
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 12:32 -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On 07/18/2010 09:38 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > I did not _really_ review this, it the patches look good. How did you
> > test them? Did you test on both large and small page NANDs?
>
> I referenced 30+ data sheets (covering 100+ parts), and I tested a
> selection of 10 different chips to varying degrees. Particularly, I
> tested the creation of bad-block descriptors and basic BB scanning on
> three parts:
>
> ST NAND04GW3B2D, 2K page
> ST NAND128W3A, 512B page
> Samsung K9F1G08U0A, 2K page
>
> To test these, I wrote some fake bad block markers to the flash (in OOB
> bytes 1, 6, and elsewhere) to see if the scanning routine would detect
> them properly. However, this method was somewhat limited because the
> driver I am using has some bugs in its OOB write functionality.
Sounds like you did a lot of work. I'll add this information to the
patch description.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-21 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-23 20:36 [PATCH] mtd/nand: Edit macro flag for BBT scan of last page in block Brian Norris
2010-06-25 21:36 ` [PATCH 2] mtd/nand, BB detect: factory marker in page 1, 2, last and byte 1 or 6 Brian Norris
2010-07-13 8:21 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-07-13 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Improved BB Scanning Brian Norris
2010-07-13 22:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd/nand, BB detect: factory marker in page 1, 2, last and byte 1 or 6 Brian Norris
2010-07-13 22:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd/nand: More BB Detection, dynamic scan options Brian Norris
2010-07-13 23:56 ` Brian Norris
2010-07-15 19:15 ` [PATCH v3 " Brian Norris
2010-07-18 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Improved BB Scanning Artem Bityutskiy
2010-07-19 19:32 ` Brian Norris
2010-07-21 9:49 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2010-07-22 19:44 ` Karl Beldan
2010-07-21 23:53 ` [PATCH] mtd/nand: Update nand_default_block_markbad() Brian Norris
2010-07-26 4:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-07-08 9:15 ` [PATCH] mtd/nand: Edit macro flag for BBT scan of last page in block Artem Bityutskiy
2010-07-13 8:01 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1279705759.2306.0.camel@localhost \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=David.Woodhouse@intel.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--cc=norris@broadcom.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.