From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philippe Gerum In-Reply-To: <20100805125828.GA22855@domain.hid> References: <1276880276.12743.73.camel@domain.hid> <4C1BA6F7.9080004@domain.hid> <20100805125828.GA22855@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:00:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1281016845.1706.0.camel@domain.hid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] [Xenomai-core] [PULL REQUEST] fixes for 2.5.4 List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Tschaeche IT-Services Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 14:58 +0200, Tschaeche IT-Services wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 07:03:51PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > > Recovery from runaway loops in primary mode is introduced by the mayday > > > patch series; the faulty thread gets relaxed, instead of being killed, > > > when the nucleus watchdog triggers. > > just adapted to Xenomai 2.5.4 with a simple patch, > exporting the xnshadow_call_mayday() symbol from nucleus, > so that we can call it from our watchdog driver. > > Should we call xnshadow_call_mayday() in another (official) way? xnshadow_call_mayday() is already exported to modules in 2.5.4. > > Regards, > > Olli -- Philippe.