From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: i.MX SDMA support Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:47:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1281350823.3035.54.camel@odin> References: <20100809091157.GC20065@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f51.google.com (mail-ww0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EDB245EF for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:47:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so403435wwa.20 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 03:47:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100809091157.GC20065@pengutronix.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Sascha Hauer Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 11:11 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Hi, > > I just posted a series adding SDMA support for i.MX to the Arm Linux > Kernel mailing list. I noticed. It's good to see SDMA support going upstream :) > It also contains a patch for adding SDMA support > to the i.MX SSI units. I haven't cc'd alsa-devel because most of the > stuff is not sound related. I know at least Mark and Liam are > interested, so I leave a pointer here. The sound stuff needs to be > synchronized with the other patches, so it's probably best if all > patches go via my tree. Yeah, that should be OK. However, we do have a ASoC core multi-component update merging later this week. This may conflict with some of your SDMA updates, although the multi-component support only really affects ASoC component probe() and remove() as every component is a regular Linux device now (with platform data, etc) and private data access. The multi-component branch is here:- git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lrg/asoc-2.6.git topic/multi-component I did have to make some changes to i.MX ASoC in order to de-couple some of the components in order for them to be distinct kernel devices. Any chance you could give this a test with the new SDMA code ? Thanks Liam -- Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer. http://www.slimlogic.co.uk