From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: perf: reword comments relating to perf_event_do_pending
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:25:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1281954331-5633-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> (raw)
This is purely a cosmetic change to the ARM perf backend because the current
comments about the relationship between NMIs, interrupt context and
perf_event_do_pending are misleading.
This patch updates the comments so that they reflect what the code
actually does (which is in line with other architectures).
Cc: Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@picochip.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h | 2 +-
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 48837e6..b5799a3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
* counter interrupts are regular interrupts and not an NMI. This
* means that when we receive the interrupt we can call
* perf_event_do_pending() that handles all of the work with
- * interrupts enabled.
+ * interrupts disabled.
*/
static inline void
set_perf_event_pending(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
index de12536..b93a8db 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1041,8 +1041,8 @@ armv6pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num,
/*
* Handle the pending perf events.
*
- * Note: this call *must* be run with interrupts enabled. For
- * platforms that can have the PMU interrupts raised as a PMI, this
+ * Note: this call *must* be run with interrupts disabled. For
+ * platforms that can have the PMU interrupts raised as an NMI, this
* will not work.
*/
perf_event_do_pending();
@@ -2017,8 +2017,8 @@ static irqreturn_t armv7pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, void *dev)
/*
* Handle the pending perf events.
*
- * Note: this call *must* be run with interrupts enabled. For
- * platforms that can have the PMU interrupts raised as a PMI, this
+ * Note: this call *must* be run with interrupts disabled. For
+ * platforms that can have the PMU interrupts raised as an NMI, this
* will not work.
*/
perf_event_do_pending();
--
1.6.3.3
next reply other threads:[~2010-08-16 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-16 10:25 Will Deacon [this message]
2010-08-16 10:35 ` [PATCH] ARM: perf: reword comments relating to perf_event_do_pending Jamie Iles
2010-08-16 11:00 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1281954331-5633-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.