From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: khilman@deeprootsystems.com, b-cousson@ti.com, paul@pwsan.com,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Subject: [RFC: PATCH] Fix to support multiple HWMODS for a single device
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:16:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282560403-30375-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> (raw)
The current HWMOD code expects multiple HWMODS to be filled in consecutive
memory location before passing to omap_device_build_ss(). Ignoring this
will result in incorrect HWMOD data being extracted. This means before calling
omap_device_build_ss() the user has to create memory chunks, copy all the HWMOD
structures to it taking care of the mutex.
This fix uses the pointer to pointer to OMAP_HWMOD structure passed to
omap_device_build_ss() to correctly extract the appropriate
OMAP_HWMOD structure.
This patch is created on top of origin/pm-wip/hwmods-omap4.
Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
index d2b1609..e94bd7a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
@@ -257,12 +257,12 @@ static inline struct omap_device *_find_by_pdev(struct platform_device *pdev)
*/
int omap_device_count_resources(struct omap_device *od)
{
- struct omap_hwmod *oh;
+ struct omap_hwmod **oh;
int c = 0;
int i;
- for (i = 0, oh = *od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
- c += omap_hwmod_count_resources(oh);
+ for (i = 0, oh = od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
+ c += omap_hwmod_count_resources(*oh);
pr_debug("omap_device: %s: counted %d total resources across %d "
"hwmods\n", od->pdev.name, c, od->hwmods_cnt);
@@ -289,12 +289,12 @@ int omap_device_count_resources(struct omap_device *od)
*/
int omap_device_fill_resources(struct omap_device *od, struct resource *res)
{
- struct omap_hwmod *oh;
+ struct omap_hwmod **oh;
int c = 0;
int i, r;
- for (i = 0, oh = *od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++) {
- r = omap_hwmod_fill_resources(oh, res);
+ for (i = 0, oh = od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++) {
+ r = omap_hwmod_fill_resources(*oh, res);
res += r;
c += r;
}
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ int omap_device_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
int ret, i;
struct omap_device *od;
- struct omap_hwmod *oh;
+ struct omap_hwmod **oh;
od = _find_by_pdev(pdev);
@@ -579,8 +579,8 @@ int omap_device_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = _omap_device_deactivate(od, IGNORE_WAKEUP_LAT);
- for (i = 0, oh = *od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
- omap_hwmod_shutdown(oh);
+ for (i = 0, oh = od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
+ omap_hwmod_shutdown(*oh);
od->_state = OMAP_DEVICE_STATE_SHUTDOWN;
@@ -692,11 +692,11 @@ void __iomem *omap_device_get_rt_va(struct omap_device *od)
*/
int omap_device_enable_hwmods(struct omap_device *od)
{
- struct omap_hwmod *oh;
+ struct omap_hwmod **oh;
int i;
- for (i = 0, oh = *od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
- omap_hwmod_enable(oh);
+ for (i = 0, oh = od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
+ omap_hwmod_enable(*oh);
/* XXX pass along return value here? */
return 0;
@@ -710,11 +710,11 @@ int omap_device_enable_hwmods(struct omap_device *od)
*/
int omap_device_idle_hwmods(struct omap_device *od)
{
- struct omap_hwmod *oh;
+ struct omap_hwmod **oh;
int i;
- for (i = 0, oh = *od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
- omap_hwmod_idle(oh);
+ for (i = 0, oh = od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
+ omap_hwmod_idle(*oh);
/* XXX pass along return value here? */
return 0;
@@ -729,11 +729,11 @@ int omap_device_idle_hwmods(struct omap_device *od)
*/
int omap_device_disable_clocks(struct omap_device *od)
{
- struct omap_hwmod *oh;
+ struct omap_hwmod **oh;
int i;
- for (i = 0, oh = *od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
- omap_hwmod_disable_clocks(oh);
+ for (i = 0, oh = od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
+ omap_hwmod_disable_clocks(*oh);
/* XXX pass along return value here? */
return 0;
@@ -748,11 +748,11 @@ int omap_device_disable_clocks(struct omap_device *od)
*/
int omap_device_enable_clocks(struct omap_device *od)
{
- struct omap_hwmod *oh;
+ struct omap_hwmod **oh;
int i;
- for (i = 0, oh = *od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
- omap_hwmod_enable_clocks(oh);
+ for (i = 0, oh = od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
+ omap_hwmod_enable_clocks(*oh);
/* XXX pass along return value here? */
return 0;
--
1.7.0.4
next reply other threads:[~2010-08-23 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-23 10:46 Kishon Vijay Abraham I [this message]
2010-08-23 11:49 ` [RFC: PATCH] Fix to support multiple HWMODS for a single device Cousson, Benoit
2010-08-23 12:01 ` Datta, Shubhrajyoti
2010-08-23 16:20 ` kishon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282560403-30375-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com \
--to=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.