From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory Bonik Subject: Re: Implementing full-duplex realtime sound processor Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:14:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1282598083.4691.26.camel@koffer> References: <1282495236.8223.7.camel@koffer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f51.google.com (mail-ww0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C0E2445E for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:14:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so706487wwb.20 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:14:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: James Courtier-Dutton Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 23/08/2010 10:50 +0100, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > Why don't you want to use JACK. It is a perfect fit for what you are > trying to do, and it solves a LOT of problems that you don't yet know > you will run into. Just because I don't want to force the users to use JACK, since it's not so standard. I plan to add support for it later, but I want my program still be usable without it. What are the problems you are talking about?