From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
To: Gary King <GKing@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix bit_mask parameter for tps6586x_set_bits()
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:03:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282914224.3025.28.camel@odin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A0A1E7539300DF49AA383E614C7827BC04EA05BE3A@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:25 -0700, Gary King wrote:
> The patch seems fine.
>
> - Gary
> ________________________________________
> From: Liam Girdwood [lrg@slimlogic.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 2:53 AM
> To: Mike Rapoport
> Cc: Mark Brown; Gary King; Axel Lin; linux-kernel
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix bit_mask parameter for tps6586x_set_bits()
>
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:09 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:42:42PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> > >> The third parameter of tps6586x_set_bits() is the bit_mask,
> > >> thus we should use (1 << ri->go_bit) instead of ri->go_bit.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > >
> > > but I'd be much happier if someone who actually has the hardware could
> > > verify that this is OK.
> >
> > I don't have the hardware handy at the moment.
> > Gary, can you please verify the fix?
> >
>
> Do we have any news on this testing ? I'd like to have these upstream
> for rc3.
>
Applied.
Thanks
Liam
--
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-27 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-22 14:38 [PATCH 1/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix value range checking for val Axel Lin
2010-08-22 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix bit_mask parameter for tps6586x_set_bits() Axel Lin
2010-08-23 10:02 ` Mark Brown
2010-08-23 10:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2010-08-25 9:53 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-08-25 15:58 ` Gary King
2010-08-26 21:25 ` Gary King
2010-08-27 13:03 ` Liam Girdwood [this message]
2010-08-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix value range checking for val Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282914224.3025.28.camel@odin \
--to=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=GKing@nvidia.com \
--cc=axel.lin@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike@compulab.co.il \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.