From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757070Ab0ICSBP (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:01:15 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:35576 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756927Ab0ICSBN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:01:13 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCHv11 2.6.36-rc2-tip 4/15] 4: uprobes: x86 specific functions for user space breakpointing. From: Peter Zijlstra To: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: Andi Kleen , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Randy Dunlap , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , Masami Hiramatsu , Oleg Nesterov , Mark Wielaard , Mathieu Desnoyers , LKML , Naren A Devaiah , Jim Keniston , Frederic Weisbecker , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Andrew Morton , "Paul E. McKenney" In-Reply-To: <20100903174832.GB14891@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20100825134117.5447.55209.sendpatchset@localhost6.localdomain6> <20100825134210.5447.10126.sendpatchset@localhost6.localdomain6> <87pqwvm8cl.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20100903174832.GB14891@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:00:57 +0200 Message-ID: <1283536857.2050.347.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 23:18 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > Maybe it's me, but I would prefer breakpoint instead of bkpt > > Even Peter wasnt comfortable with user_bkpt. My main objection was the uprobe.c and user_bkpt.c splitup, its all about uprobes, but as to this name, you can simply name it uprobe_opcode_t, no need to preserve the whole user breakpoint thing at all.