From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.12]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8AERvOB026001 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:27:57 -0400 Received: from ps536.phatservers.com (ps536.phatservers.com [216.17.105.202]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8AERngh012073 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:27:49 -0400 Received: from r74-192-2-154.bcstcmta01.clsttx.tl.dh.suddenlink.net ([74.192.2.154] helo=raydesk1.bettercgi.com) by ps536.phatservers.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1Ou4Zt-0001c4-Kt for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:27:46 -0700 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:27:43 -0500 From: Ray Morris References: <4C868067.8050909@Media-Brokers.com> <4C8A3F22.3070908@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <4C8A3F22.3070908@cox.net> (from rascal.jumper-747@cox.net on Fri Sep 10 09:22:26 2010) Message-Id: <1284128863.20650.40@raydesk1.bettercgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupted Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp="Yes"; format="Flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development >> Dumb/obvious question... you did reduce the size of the filesystem >> *before* reducing the size of the LV, right? >> > > And, if it was done out of sequence, is there a way to still fix it? If you did not increase the ize of the lv-wf2 FILESYSTEM yet, you should be able to undo what was done. See vgcfgrestore. -- Ray Morris support@bettercgi.com Strongbox - The next generation in site security: http://www.bettercgi.com/strongbox/ Throttlebox - Intelligent Bandwidth Control http://www.bettercgi.com/throttlebox/ Strongbox / Throttlebox affiliate program: http://www.bettercgi.com/affiliates/user/register.php On 09/10/2010 09:22:26 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > On 09/07/2010 02:11 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: >> On 2010-09-07 12:45 PM, James Corteciano >> wrote: >>> 2) I run system-config-lvm and reduce lv-wf1 from 160G to 70G and >>> increased lv-wf2 from 10G to 30G. >>> >>> Now, when I run the rhcs-nfs1 service using the command "clusvcadm >>> -e rhcs-nfs1 -m rhcs-node1", I got failed result. I have checked the >>> /var/log/messages and this is the output. >> Dumb/obvious question... you did reduce the size of the filesystem >> *before* reducing the size of the LV, right? >> > > And, if it was done out of sequence, is there a way to still fix it? > > TIA > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ >