From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755056Ab0IMLtq (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:49:46 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:41973 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754799Ab0IMLtp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:49:45 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 1/2] sched: dynamically adapt granularity with
 nr_running
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
In-Reply-To: <1284378235.2275.227.camel@laptop>
References: <20100911173732.551632040@efficios.com>
	 <20100911174003.051303123@efficios.com> <20100912061452.GA3383@elte.hu>
	 <1284276098.9111.24.camel@marge.simson.net>
	 <20100912181626.GB32327@Krystal>
	 <1284351183.7321.36.camel@marge.simson.net>
	 <20100913064153.GB14728@elte.hu>
	 <1284361716.25120.19.camel@marge.simson.net>
	 <1284366936.2275.27.camel@laptop>
	 <1284369373.14710.11.camel@marge.simson.net>
	 <1284370660.2275.86.camel@laptop>
	 <1284371457.14888.9.camel@marge.simson.net>
	 <1284371756.2275.108.camel@laptop>  <1284374728.2275.159.camel@laptop>
	 <1284378235.2275.227.camel@laptop>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:49:31 +0200
Message-ID: <1284378571.2275.233.camel@laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:43 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +
> +               if (node->rb_left &&
> +                   se_of(node->rb_left)->min_deadline == se->min_deadline) {
> +                       node = node->rb_left;
> +               } 

There wants to be a continue in that branch.