From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, paul@pwsan.com, vishwanath.bs@ti.com,
sawant@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] OMAP4: pm.c extensions for OMAP4 support
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:35:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284489354.2661.74.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284488501.2661.72.camel@localhost>
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 11:21 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:44 +0530, Thara Gopinath wrote:
> > OMAP4 has an iva device and a dsp devcice where as OMAP2/3
> > has only an iva device. In this file the iva device in the
> > system is registered under the name dsp_dev and the API
> > to retrieve the iva device is omap2_get_dsp_device.
> > This patch renames the dsp_dev to iva_dev, renames
> > omap2_get_dsp_device to omap2_get_iva_device,
> > registers dsp_dev for OMAP4 and adds a new API
> > omap4_get_dsp_device to retrieve the dep_dev.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
> > ---
> > v2: Removed fixing of l3_main hwmod for OMAP4 as Benoit has
> > already submitted a pach fixing the same.
> > v3: Put OMAP4 check across dsp_dev init so that on other
> > OMAP's this init does not throw a warn.
>
> Thanks, queuing for 2.6.37 in my pm-next branch.
>
> I changed the subject slightly, and I had to fix up a conflict that
> wasn't there when you submitted, so I fixed it myself: basically, there
> was already a cpu_is_omap4* check in the function due to the l3_main
> name differences, so I just added the dsp check to the existing cpu_is
> check.
Ignore the bit about the conflict. It applies cleanly to my pm-next.
The conflict is when merging with the l3_main name change later in the
pm-core branch.
Kevin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-14 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-01 8:14 [PATCH v3] OMAP4: pm.c extensions for OMAP4 support Thara Gopinath
2010-09-14 18:21 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-09-14 18:35 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1284489354.2661.74.camel@localhost \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=sawant@ti.com \
--cc=thara@ti.com \
--cc=vishwanath.bs@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.