From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753220Ab0ISLmz (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Sep 2010 07:42:55 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:36629 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752098Ab0ISLmy convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Sep 2010 07:42:54 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] Add IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING, finer accounting of CPU irq time From: Peter Zijlstra To: Venkatesh Pallipadi Cc: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Balbir Singh , Martin Schwidefsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Turner In-Reply-To: <1284895291.2275.617.camel@laptop> References: <1284688596-6731-1-git-send-email-venki@google.com> <1284688596-6731-3-git-send-email-venki@google.com> <1284895291.2275.617.camel@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:42:40 +0200 Message-ID: <1284896560.2275.632.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 13:21 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 18:56 -0700, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote: > > +void account_system_vtime(struct task_struct *tsk) > > +{ > > + unsigned long flags; > > + int cpu; > > + u64 now, delta; > > + > > + if (!sched_clock_irqtime) > > + return; > > + > > + local_irq_save(flags); > > + > > + cpu = task_cpu(tsk); > > + now = sched_clock(); > > + delta = now - per_cpu(irq_start_time, cpu); > > + per_cpu(irq_start_time, cpu) = now; > > + if (hardirq_count()) > > + per_cpu(cpu_hardirq_time, cpu) += delta; > > + else if (softirq_count()) > > + per_cpu(cpu_softirq_time, cpu) += delta; > > + > > + local_irq_restore(flags); > > +} > > This seems to suggest you count time double if a hardirq hits while > we're doing softirqs, but being as this is an incomplete api its very > hard to tell indeed. Argh, so this function is called on both _enter and _exit, egads. Imagine the following in task context: local_bh_disable(); local_bh_enable(); That seems to incorrectly inflate softirq_time.