From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avoid second smp_processor_id() call in __touch_watchdog
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:39:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285173559.2275.1024.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100922162730.GC5302@nowhere>
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 18:27 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> I'm not sure we want this. This is called by the watchdog internally,
> from the timer or the cpu bound thread, so we probably should better
> keep __get_cpu_var() because it checks that we are not in a preemptable
> section.
The smp_processor_id() right at the start already does that.
That said, I doubt it really matter one way or the other, compilers have
been known to do CSE for quite a while.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-22 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-13 10:21 fix BUG: using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watchdog and touch_softlockup_watchdog Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-08-16 8:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-16 13:34 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-16 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-16 14:08 ` [PATCH] fix BUG " Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-08-16 14:30 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-17 4:27 ` Yong Zhang
2010-08-17 2:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-08-17 3:16 ` Yong Zhang
2010-08-17 8:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-08-17 9:05 ` Yong Zhang
2010-08-17 9:24 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-08-17 9:37 ` Yong Zhang
2010-08-17 10:28 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-08-17 12:48 ` Yong Zhang
2010-08-17 10:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-08-17 12:56 ` Yong Zhang
2010-08-17 13:13 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-18 2:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-08-18 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-19 2:27 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-20 2:57 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-20 3:42 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-20 12:34 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-26 17:17 ` acpi_os_stall() and touch_nmi_watchdog() (was Re: [PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watchdog and touch_softlockup_watchdog) Len Brown
2010-08-20 15:02 ` [PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watchdog and touch_softlockup_watchdog Yong Zhang
2010-08-26 10:14 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-26 14:40 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-17 7:56 ` [PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watchdog and touch_softlockup_watchdog (v2) Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-08-16 14:12 ` fix BUG: using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watchdog and touch_softlockup_watchdog Don Zickus
2010-08-16 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-16 14:06 ` Yong Zhang
2010-08-18 19:33 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-18 21:44 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-22 9:00 ` [PATCH] avoid second smp_processor_id() call in __touch_watchdog Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-09-22 14:41 ` Don Zickus
2010-09-22 16:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-09-22 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-09-22 16:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-09-24 19:34 ` Don Zickus
2010-09-25 17:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1285173559.2275.1024.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.