All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1285291254.25928.223.camel@Joe-Laptop>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index e58d1b0..907e241 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ all true.
 Overall, I believe it'll be more code, but all right.
 
 > If you did so, the first patch that refactors to create a helper function
-> can address issues Ævar raised in the review to clean things up, no?
+> can address issues Ævar raised in the review to clean things up, no?
 
 > I notice that you use parse_address_line() while $cc_cmd codepath doesn't.
 > I haven't studied other codepaths deeply, but my gut feeling is that the
@@ -61,9 +61,3 @@ Overall, I believe it'll be more code, but all right.
 > pushes the result to @cc), but because the code is simply sloppy.
 
 Probably, I wrote some of those lines...
-
-
---
-To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
-the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
-More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 23ec726..da2ca15 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
  "ref\07v62xwqe7i.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org\0"
  "From\0Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH V2] git-send-email.perl: Add --to-cmd\0"
- "Date\0Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:20:54 +0000\0"
+ "Date\0Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:20:54 -0700\0"
  "To\0Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>\0"
  "Cc\0\303\206var Arnfj\303\266r\303\260 Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>"
   Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
  "Overall, I believe it'll be more code, but all right.\n"
  "\n"
  "> If you did so, the first patch that refactors to create a helper function\n"
- "> can address issues \303\203\342\200\240var raised in the review to clean things up, no?\n"
+ "> can address issues \303\206var raised in the review to clean things up, no?\n"
  "\n"
  "> I notice that you use parse_address_line() while $cc_cmd codepath doesn't.\n"
  "> I haven't studied other codepaths deeply, but my gut feeling is that the\n"
@@ -87,12 +87,6 @@
  "> sanitized (the codepath to parse \"Cc: \" calls parse_address_line and\n"
  "> pushes the result to @cc), but because the code is simply sloppy.\n"
  "\n"
- "Probably, I wrote some of those lines...\n"
- "\n"
- "\n"
- "--\n"
- "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe kernel-janitors\" in\n"
- "the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n"
- More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
+ Probably, I wrote some of those lines...
 
-d1dd88e9b5e1f94341b3b4f4128d2f832e65bdb1b68824856620dbd599ae1f2b
+31b2d9fe4ea6002f89eb6bf86d7191443c0891bdcb7f944ba1b48833cc3cf077

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.