From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.reciva.com ([109.169.29.93] helo=crown.reciva.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0bAW-0002VT-9p for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:28:33 +0200 Received: from [62.7.80.98] (helo=lurch.internal.reciva.com) by crown.reciva.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0bAM-0005FI-7j for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:28:22 +0100 Received: from mill.internal.reciva.com ([192.168.106.87] ident=pb) by lurch.internal.reciva.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P0bAL-0001k6-W9 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:28:22 +0100 From: Phil Blundell To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: References: <1285456630-27680-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:28:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1285684101.32349.3.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 X-Broken-Reverse-DNS: no host name found for IP address 62.7.80.98 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 109.169.29.93 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: philb@gnu.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] sane-toolchain.inc: Make gcc 4.5 & eglibc 2.12 as default sane versions X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:28:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 15:47 +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote: > Khem Raj writes: > > > GCC 4.5 has been tested quite a bit > > Probably not on ARMv5 ;) There 5/3 == 3 holds and ld.so crashes due to > related errors. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45817 That bug seems to be specific to --enable-target-optspace, which (afaik) isn't selected for armv5 by the current recipes. Are you actually seeing that bug on a toolchain built with the settings in OE? p.