From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mtd/nand: add support for BBT without OOB
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:14:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285838065.11684.57.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100930085111.GA12354@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc>
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 10:51 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Artem Bityutskiy | 2010-09-29 23:11:04 [+0300]:
>
> >Few minor things.
> >
> >First, is it please possible to add more descriptive comment into the
> >code. Something like you put to the patch description, may be even a bit
> >more descriptive. May be to the header of nand_bbt.c?
> We usually don't have description in C code. Usually there is kernel doc
> which describe the function and some description in Documentation/
> which describes how should work. I could add something to the header of
> the file and we move it leater to Doc*/mtd/bbt_hadling.txt ?
My point was that it is better to have a somewhat descriptive comment
in .c file which explains the differences in BBTs and reasons for them
and classifies them. This helps a lot. I mean, .c file comment is better
than no comments.
But a got Doc*/mtd/bbt_hadling.txt would be perfect, if you go that far,
this would be even better.
> >> + if (marker_len) {
> >> + /*
> >> + * In case the BBT marker is not in the OOB area it
> >> + * will be just in the first page
> >> + */
> >
> >Yes, this is the right multi-line comment. You may also put a dot at the
> >end. But in other places you used not the right multi-line comments.
> The missing dot is probally easy to fix. Other place where I did not use
> correct multi-line comments are the .h file were I successfully
> attempted to follow the style there. I'm going to fix it as well.
Thanks!
> >> +/* If passed additionally to NAND_USE_FLASH_BBT then BBT code will not touch
> >> + * the OOB area */
> >
> >And this. Yeah, I know this file uses different styles, but you could
> >convert even all of them.
> I would prefer to send a cleanup afterwards and not mixing code changes
> with no changes.
Ok.
> You want someone to keep checkpatch shut for other files as well or just
> this one?
You could do this for this file, but if you do for other files, this is
even better :-) Do as much extra contribution as you feel like!
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-30 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-29 17:43 Add support for BBT without touching OOB area Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-09-29 17:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] mtd/nand: use ALIGN where possible Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-09-29 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] mtd/nand: pull in td into read_bbt() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-09-29 17:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] mtd/nand: add support for BBT without OOB Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-09-29 20:11 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-09-30 8:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-09-30 9:14 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2010-09-30 19:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-10-01 18:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-09-29 17:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] mtd/nand: introduce NAND_CREATE_EMPTY_BBT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-10-01 18:57 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-10-01 19:37 ` [PATCH v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-10-01 20:00 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-09-29 17:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] mtd/nandsim: add module param for BBT handling Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2010-09-29 20:11 ` Add support for BBT without touching OOB area Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1285838065.11684.57.camel@localhost \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sebastian@breakpoint.cc \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.