All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] neigh: speedup neigh_resolve_output()
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:44:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286484247.3745.91.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286456008.2912.171.camel@edumazet-laptop>

Le jeudi 07 octobre 2010 à 14:53 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :

> Further improvements would need to use a seqlock instead of an rwlock to
> protect neigh->ha[], to not dirty neigh too often and remove two atomic
> ops.
> 

I implemented this idea in following patch, on top on previous one.

[PATCH net-next] neigh: speedup neigh_resolve_output()

Add a seqlock in struct neighbour to protect neigh->ha[], and avoid
dirtying neighbour in stress situation (many different flows / dsts)

Dirtying takes place because of read_lock(&n->lock) and n->used writes.

Switching to a seqlock, and writing n->used only on jiffies changes
permits less dirtying.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
 include/net/neighbour.h |   16 ++++++++++++
 net/core/neighbour.c    |   47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 net/ipv4/arp.c          |    6 +---
 net/sched/sch_teql.c    |    8 +++---
 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/neighbour.h b/include/net/neighbour.h
index a4538d5..f04e7a2 100644
--- a/include/net/neighbour.h
+++ b/include/net/neighbour.h
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct neighbour {
 	atomic_t		refcnt;
 	atomic_t		probes;
 	rwlock_t		lock;
+	seqlock_t		ha_lock;
 	unsigned char		ha[ALIGN(MAX_ADDR_LEN, sizeof(unsigned long))];
 	struct hh_cache		*hh;
 	int			(*output)(struct sk_buff *skb);
@@ -302,7 +303,10 @@ static inline void neigh_confirm(struct neighbour *neigh)
 
 static inline int neigh_event_send(struct neighbour *neigh, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	neigh->used = jiffies;
+	unsigned long now = ACCESS_ONCE(jiffies);
+	
+	if (neigh->used != now)
+		neigh->used = now;
 	if (!(neigh->nud_state&(NUD_CONNECTED|NUD_DELAY|NUD_PROBE)))
 		return __neigh_event_send(neigh, skb);
 	return 0;
@@ -373,4 +377,14 @@ struct neighbour_cb {
 
 #define NEIGH_CB(skb)	((struct neighbour_cb *)(skb)->cb)
 
+static inline void neigh_ha_snapshot(char *dst, const struct neighbour *n,
+				     const struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	unsigned int seq;
+
+	do {
+		seq = read_seqbegin(&n->ha_lock);
+		memcpy(dst, n->ha, dev->addr_len);
+	} while (read_seqretry(&n->ha_lock, seq));
+}
 #endif
diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
index 53cc548..54aef9c 100644
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -294,6 +294,7 @@ static struct neighbour *neigh_alloc(struct neigh_table *tbl)
 
 	skb_queue_head_init(&n->arp_queue);
 	rwlock_init(&n->lock);
+	seqlock_init(&n->ha_lock);
 	n->updated	  = n->used = now;
 	n->nud_state	  = NUD_NONE;
 	n->output	  = neigh_blackhole;
@@ -1015,7 +1016,7 @@ out_unlock_bh:
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__neigh_event_send);
 
-static void neigh_update_hhs(struct neighbour *neigh)
+static void neigh_update_hhs(const struct neighbour *neigh)
 {
 	struct hh_cache *hh;
 	void (*update)(struct hh_cache*, const struct net_device*, const unsigned char *)
@@ -1151,7 +1152,9 @@ int neigh_update(struct neighbour *neigh, const u8 *lladdr, u8 new,
 	}
 
 	if (lladdr != neigh->ha) {
+		write_seqlock(&neigh->ha_lock);
 		memcpy(&neigh->ha, lladdr, dev->addr_len);
+		write_sequnlock(&neigh->ha_lock);
 		neigh_update_hhs(neigh);
 		if (!(new & NUD_CONNECTED))
 			neigh->confirmed = jiffies -
@@ -1214,6 +1217,7 @@ static inline bool neigh_hh_lookup(struct neighbour *n, struct dst_entry *dst,
 {
 	struct hh_cache *hh;
 
+	smp_rmb(); /* paired with smp_wmb() in neigh_hh_init() */
 	for (hh = n->hh; hh; hh = hh->hh_next) {
 		if (hh->hh_type == protocol) {
 			atomic_inc(&hh->hh_refcnt);
@@ -1248,8 +1252,8 @@ static void neigh_hh_init(struct neighbour *n, struct dst_entry *dst,
 		kfree(hh);
 		return;
 	}
-	read_unlock(&n->lock);
-	write_lock(&n->lock);
+
+	write_lock_bh(&n->lock);
 	
 	/* must check if another thread already did the insert */
 	if (neigh_hh_lookup(n, dst, protocol)) {
@@ -1263,13 +1267,13 @@ static void neigh_hh_init(struct neighbour *n, struct dst_entry *dst,
 		hh->hh_output = n->ops->output;
 
 	hh->hh_next = n->hh;
+	smp_wmb(); /* paired with smp_rmb() in neigh_hh_lookup() */
 	n->hh	    = hh;
 
 	if (unlikely(cmpxchg(&dst->hh, NULL, hh) != NULL))
 		hh_cache_put(hh);
 end:
-	write_unlock(&n->lock);
-	read_lock(&n->lock);
+	write_unlock_bh(&n->lock);
 }
 
 /* This function can be used in contexts, where only old dev_queue_xmit
@@ -1308,16 +1312,18 @@ int neigh_resolve_output(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (!neigh_event_send(neigh, skb)) {
 		int err;
 		struct net_device *dev = neigh->dev;
+		unsigned int seq;
 
-		read_lock_bh(&neigh->lock);
 		if (dev->header_ops->cache &&
 		    !dst->hh &&
 		    !(dst->flags & DST_NOCACHE))
 			neigh_hh_init(neigh, dst, dst->ops->protocol);
 
-		err = dev_hard_header(skb, dev, ntohs(skb->protocol),
-				      neigh->ha, NULL, skb->len);
-		read_unlock_bh(&neigh->lock);
+		do {
+			seq = read_seqbegin(&neigh->ha_lock);
+			err = dev_hard_header(skb, dev, ntohs(skb->protocol),
+					      neigh->ha, NULL, skb->len);
+		} while (read_seqretry(&neigh->ha_lock, seq));
 
 		if (err >= 0)
 			rc = neigh->ops->queue_xmit(skb);
@@ -1344,13 +1350,16 @@ int neigh_connected_output(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	struct dst_entry *dst = skb_dst(skb);
 	struct neighbour *neigh = dst->neighbour;
 	struct net_device *dev = neigh->dev;
+	unsigned int seq;
 
 	__skb_pull(skb, skb_network_offset(skb));
 
-	read_lock_bh(&neigh->lock);
-	err = dev_hard_header(skb, dev, ntohs(skb->protocol),
-			      neigh->ha, NULL, skb->len);
-	read_unlock_bh(&neigh->lock);
+	do {
+		seq = read_seqbegin(&neigh->ha_lock);
+		err = dev_hard_header(skb, dev, ntohs(skb->protocol),
+				      neigh->ha, NULL, skb->len);
+	} while (read_seqretry(&neigh->ha_lock, seq));
+
 	if (err >= 0)
 		err = neigh->ops->queue_xmit(skb);
 	else {
@@ -2148,10 +2157,14 @@ static int neigh_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct neighbour *neigh,
 
 	read_lock_bh(&neigh->lock);
 	ndm->ndm_state	 = neigh->nud_state;
-	if ((neigh->nud_state & NUD_VALID) &&
-	    nla_put(skb, NDA_LLADDR, neigh->dev->addr_len, neigh->ha) < 0) {
-		read_unlock_bh(&neigh->lock);
-		goto nla_put_failure;
+	if (neigh->nud_state & NUD_VALID) {
+		char haddr[MAX_ADDR_LEN];
+
+		neigh_ha_snapshot(haddr, neigh, neigh->dev);
+		if (nla_put(skb, NDA_LLADDR, neigh->dev->addr_len, haddr) < 0) {
+			read_unlock_bh(&neigh->lock);
+			goto nla_put_failure;
+		}
 	}
 
 	ci.ndm_used	 = jiffies_to_clock_t(now - neigh->used);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/arp.c b/net/ipv4/arp.c
index f353095..d8e540c 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/arp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/arp.c
@@ -502,10 +502,8 @@ int arp_find(unsigned char *haddr, struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 	if (n) {
 		n->used = jiffies;
-		if (n->nud_state&NUD_VALID || neigh_event_send(n, skb) == 0) {
-			read_lock_bh(&n->lock);
-			memcpy(haddr, n->ha, dev->addr_len);
-			read_unlock_bh(&n->lock);
+		if (n->nud_state & NUD_VALID || neigh_event_send(n, skb) == 0) {
+			neigh_ha_snapshot(haddr, n, dev);
 			neigh_release(n);
 			return 0;
 		}
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_teql.c b/net/sched/sch_teql.c
index feaabc1..401af95 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_teql.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_teql.c
@@ -241,11 +241,11 @@ __teql_resolve(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sk_buff *skb_res, struct net_device *
 	}
 	if (neigh_event_send(n, skb_res) == 0) {
 		int err;
+		char haddr[MAX_ADDR_LEN];
 
-		read_lock(&n->lock);
-		err = dev_hard_header(skb, dev, ntohs(skb->protocol),
-				      n->ha, NULL, skb->len);
-		read_unlock(&n->lock);
+		neigh_ha_snapshot(haddr, n, dev);
+		err = dev_hard_header(skb, dev, ntohs(skb->protocol), haddr,
+				      NULL, skb->len);
 
 		if (err < 0) {
 			neigh_release(n);



  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-07 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-07 12:53 [PATCH net-next] neigh: speedup neigh_hh_init() Eric Dumazet
2010-10-07 20:44 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-10-11 19:16   ` [PATCH net-next] neigh: speedup neigh_resolve_output() David Miller
2010-10-11 19:46     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-11 20:01       ` David Miller
2010-10-11 22:02         ` [PATCH net-next] neigh: reorder struct neighbour fields Eric Dumazet
2010-10-11 22:20           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-11 23:09             ` David Miller
2010-10-11 16:18 ` [PATCH net-next] neigh: speedup neigh_hh_init() David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1286484247.3745.91.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.