From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754031Ab0JGVvS (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:51:18 -0400 Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:52740 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751713Ab0JGVvQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:51:16 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6129"; a="57100852" Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: DCC(JTAG) serial and console emulation support From: Daniel Walker To: Mike Frysinger Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Hyok S. Choi" , Tony Lindgren , Jeff Ohlstein , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ben Dooks , Alan Cox , Kukjin Kim , Feng Tang , Tobias Klauser , Jason Wessel , Philippe Langlais In-Reply-To: References: <1286476616-3373-1-git-send-email-dwalker@codeaurora.org> <1286480364.23836.17.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <1286481532.23836.27.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <1286482013.23836.29.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <1286485186.23836.56.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <1286486274.23836.62.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:50:50 -0700 Message-ID: <1286488250.23836.104.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 17:32 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Ideally you would want this driver to work in any situation .. If it's > > setup to use ttyS0 for debugging, even if it doesn't exist, then this > > driver would be able to stand in for that interface. > > i dont think that's the case. "any situation" is way too vague and > invites mounds of crap to be included in the kernel which really > should be in userspace. ive never had a problem with my embedded work > using ttyBF# or ttyBFJC# or ttySS# for the Blackfin serial devices, > nor have i heard customers complain that the file absolutely must be > named "ttyS#". ive found that simply informing them "to use ttyBF#" > has always been sufficient. > -mike It's kind of a "your milage may vary" situation .. From my perspective it doesn't hurt anything to have an exception for this, considering what it is used for. Daniel -- Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.