From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>,
Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the msm tree with the arm tree
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:27:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1287440826.5588.83.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101018215815.GC23642@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 22:58 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 02:29:22PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > That's why we have get_maintainer.pl, it adds in all the CC's
> > automatically ..
>
> $ git diff-tree -u 861bd81ee62a0d6759144c22909a8a3938951656 | scripts/get_maintainer.pl |wc
> 209 624 8021
>
> 209 recipients / 8K of To:/CC: is reasonable?
The answer is not "The tool doesn't work like I want, so screw it." If
the tool doesn't work like we want, then we need to fix the tool not
just walk away. Not to mention that the people involved in making these
patches should still be CC'ing people even if this tool is just helping
them out instead of actually doing it for them.
What it's showing you is anyone that's ever modified those files.. You
just need the people who maintain the files.
how about this,
git show 08a610d9ef5394525b0328da0162d7b58c982cc4 | ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl | wc
58 163 2169
That's the patch we're actually discussing too. It's about one CC per
file modified.
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-18 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-17 23:35 linux-next: manual merge of the msm tree with the arm tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-18 0:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-18 8:15 ` Russell King
2010-10-18 17:26 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 18:20 ` Russell King
2010-10-18 18:46 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 19:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-18 20:12 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 20:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-18 20:37 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 20:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-18 21:05 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 21:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-18 21:35 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 21:11 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-18 20:58 ` Russell King
2010-10-18 21:29 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 21:58 ` Russell King
2010-10-18 22:27 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2010-10-18 22:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-18 22:53 ` Joe Perches
2010-10-19 13:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-19 17:03 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-19 17:18 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-19 18:42 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-19 18:53 ` Russell King
2010-10-19 19:24 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-19 18:34 ` Russell King
2010-10-19 18:49 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 23:09 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 23:32 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-18 23:45 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-19 2:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-19 16:55 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 20:19 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-18 20:57 ` Nicolas Pitre
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-31 6:08 Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-31 2:14 Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-31 2:14 Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-02 18:29 ` David Brown
2011-02-02 19:43 ` Greg KH
2011-02-02 20:00 ` Russell King
2011-02-02 20:32 ` Greg KH
2011-02-02 20:44 ` Russell King
2011-02-02 21:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-02 22:46 ` David Brown
2011-02-02 22:59 ` David Brown
2011-02-03 0:15 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-04 17:17 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-04 17:42 ` Russell King
2011-02-04 18:02 ` David Brown
2011-02-04 18:10 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-04 19:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-04 20:38 ` David Brown
2010-05-04 1:07 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-04 16:42 ` Daniel Walker
2010-05-04 21:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1287440826.5588.83.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com \
--to=dwalker@fifo99.com \
--cc=jeremy.kerr@canonical.com \
--cc=johlstei@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.