Re: future r4 maintenance question

["Maciej Sołtysiak" <pysiak.satriani@wp.pl>]

Hello Hans,

Saturday, July 22, 2006, 8:03:28 PM, you wrote:

> We are going to give changing the paradigm a try.  The difference
> between 4.1-beta and 4.0 is that different plugins are the default, and
> the experimental code is in the plugins you see when mounting with the
> mount option 4.1-beta.   Let's see if it works in practice.....
I Understand. This is good news. Hm, do you think that reiser4's pluggability
is enough to have this single kernel tree (fs/reiser4) for a longer period
of time. I mean, can you predict a need of spawning something like reiser5
in the forseeable future or would fs/reiser4 + plugins be enough to do
away with the "future vision" and other "future *" stuff you've written
about ? eg. I remember reading about very granular security ACLs like
restricting a certain line in a file (like /etc/passwd)

-- 
Best regards,
Maciej