From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756370Ab0JVMr7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:47:59 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:42060 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754601Ab0JVMr6 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:47:58 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] cgroups: Allow to bind a subsystem to a cgroup hierarchy From: Peter Zijlstra To: Li Zefan Cc: "akpm >> Andrew Morton" , Paul Menage , Stephane Eranian , LKML , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org In-Reply-To: <4CC146D4.7030009@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <4CC146A4.9090505@cn.fujitsu.com> <4CC146D4.7030009@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:47:11 +0200 Message-ID: <1287751631.15336.33.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 16:09 +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > For example, we can't decide a cgroup's cpuset.mems and > cpuset.cpus automatically, so cpuset is not bindable. You mean to say that you cannot add cpuset to an existing hierarchy right? Not that you cannot add perf/cpuacct to an existing cpuset hierarchy?