From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?q?Amadeusz_=C5=BBo=C5=82nowski?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] 90crypt: keys on external devices support Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:40:09 +0200 Message-ID: <1287761977-sup-4635@etiriah> References: <4CBDA328.40401@googlemail.com> <1287497223-sup-3606@etiriah> <4CBDAC3D.7050906@googlemail.com> <4CBE44D3.6070000@googlemail.com> <1287580805-sup-6517@etiriah> <4CBF004F.9070201@googlemail.com> <1287586242-sup-9146@etiriah> <20101021132916.GC22186@nb.net.home> <4CC0462E.20507@googlemail.com> <20101021151802.GD22186@nb.net.home> <4CC060B3.3050508@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; boundary="=-1287765609-549042-16039-3569-3-="; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <4CC060B3.3050508-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Sender: initramfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: To: Mr Dash Four Cc: Karel Zak , initramfs --=-1287765609-549042-16039-3569-3-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This thread is becoming huuuge. :-) Excerpts from Mr Dash Four's message of Thu Oct 21 17:48:03 +0200 2010: > My point still stands though - leaving the 'guessing' of the target fil= e = > system to mount is not a good idea and should not be = > removed as a parameter (it may not be mandatory, but should always be = > catered for). File system is mounted read-only, so even on wrong guess nothing bad may happen. I think Karel has made good point about parameter. But if you need to insist on having it, we might introduce following syntax: rd.luks.key=3D[:[:]] Unfolding in BNF: ::=3D "UUID=3D" | "LABEL=3D"