From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758186Ab0JZHZv (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 03:25:51 -0400 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:8960 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752452Ab0JZHZu (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 03:25:50 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,239,1286164800"; d="scan'208";a="119688876" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] xen: events: cleanups after irq core improvements (Was: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [tip:irq/core] x86: xen: Sanitise sparse_irq handling) From: Ian Campbell To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge CC: "H. Peter Anvin" , Stefano Stabellini , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "mingo@redhat.com" , "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" , "mingo@elte.hu" , "tglx@linutronix.de" In-Reply-To: <4CC60CDD.8040209@goop.org> References: <4CB8EE8A.5020900@goop.org> <4CB8EF30.7060504@goop.org> <6a6702dc-7dbb-47a3-a0cf-18c8a65252fe@email.android.com> <1288023736.11153.40.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <4CC60CDD.8040209@goop.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:25:46 +0100 Message-ID: <1288077946.10179.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 00:03 +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 10/25/2010 09:22 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > I'm about to followup with an initial stab at some cleanups which are > > made possible by these core changes, including hanging the per-irq info > > off the handler_data. > > > > These patches are on top of recent Linus master tree plus Konrad's > > swiotlb-xen tree and Stefano's PVHVM tree since the latter in particular > > touches the same area. > > This looks pretty good. How much testing have you given it? Not as much as I would like. I've tested normal PV domU operation and live migration and that's about it. I've not tested anything involving hardware interrupts (so no passthrough, dom0, msi etc). > Do you have a git branch I can pull? The patches are currently based on trees in linux-next since they depend on your, Konrad's and Stefano's trees (especially Stefano's, I think) so I don't yet have a stable base for a branch. Once those flow through I can produce a proper branch. Ian. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] xen: events: cleanups after irq core improvements (Was: Re: Re: [tip:irq/core] x86: xen: Sanitise sparse_irq handling) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:25:46 +0100 Message-ID: <1288077946.10179.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <4CB8EE8A.5020900@goop.org> <4CB8EF30.7060504@goop.org> <6a6702dc-7dbb-47a3-a0cf-18c8a65252fe@email.android.com> <1288023736.11153.40.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <4CC60CDD.8040209@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4CC60CDD.8040209@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Stefano Stabellini , "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "mingo@elte.hu" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 00:03 +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 10/25/2010 09:22 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > I'm about to followup with an initial stab at some cleanups which are > > made possible by these core changes, including hanging the per-irq info > > off the handler_data. > > > > These patches are on top of recent Linus master tree plus Konrad's > > swiotlb-xen tree and Stefano's PVHVM tree since the latter in particular > > touches the same area. > > This looks pretty good. How much testing have you given it? Not as much as I would like. I've tested normal PV domU operation and live migration and that's about it. I've not tested anything involving hardware interrupts (so no passthrough, dom0, msi etc). > Do you have a git branch I can pull? The patches are currently based on trees in linux-next since they depend on your, Konrad's and Stefano's trees (especially Stefano's, I think) so I don't yet have a stable base for a branch. Once those flow through I can produce a proper branch. Ian.