From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: yamahata@valinux.co.jp, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] msi: Store the capability size in PCIDevice
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 08:23:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288707790.3045.18.camel@x201> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101102140736.GB29373@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 16:07 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:00:38AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 11:25 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 11:37:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > Avoid needing to get the MSI capability flags every time we need to
> > > > check the capability length. This also makes it accessible outside
> > > > of msi.c, making it easier for users to filter config space writes
> > > > using msi_cap and msi_cap_size.
> > >
> > > I think for this last use-case, we are better off with returning a
> > > boolean from msi_write_config which tells us whether the write is in
> > > range. This has the advantage in that it will also work well for other
> > > capabilities. Or second best, if that is insufficient for some reason,
> > > export an msi_cap_size function.
> >
> > Returning whether the write was in range isn't enough. For device
> > assignment, I need to know whether the capability was enabled or
> > disabled. This currently means checking the enable state before and
> > after calling msi_write_config and doing the appropriate backend setup.
>
> Sounds good. Why does this mean you need the capability size?
> bool was_enabled = msi_enabled(dev);
> msi_write_config(..)
> if (was_enabled != msi_enabled(dev)) {
> }
Because this code makes me sad...
bool msi_was_enabled, msix_was_enabled, msi_is_enabled, msix_is_enabled;
msi_was_enabled = msi_enabled(dev);
msix_was_enabled = msix_enabled(dev);
pci_default_write_config(...
msi_write_config(...
msix_write_config(...
msi_is_enabled = msi_enabled(dev);
msix_is_enabled = msix_enabled(dev);
if (msi_was_enabled && !msi_is_enabled)
disable_msi(...
if (!msi_was_enabled && msi_is_enabled)
enable_msi(...
if (msix_was_enabled && !msix_is_enabled)
disable_msi(...
if (!msix_was_enabled && msix_is_enabled)
enable_msix(...
Confining msi tests to an msi related write and msix tests to an msix
related write makes me slightly happier. I really think we need
callbacks though so common msi/msix code can figure out if we've made a
transition.
Alex
> > I think the only way I could blindly call the msi/x write config
> > routines is if we init the capability with enable/disable callbacks.
> > I'd be ok with an msi_cap_size function if we don't want to go that far
> > too. What do you prefer? Thanks,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-02 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-02 5:37 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] msi: Small fixes and enhancements Alex Williamson
2010-11-02 5:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] msi: Allow pre-existing MSI capabilities Alex Williamson
2010-11-02 12:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-02 5:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] msi: Cleanup uninit Alex Williamson
2010-11-02 5:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] msi: Store the capability size in PCIDevice Alex Williamson
2010-11-02 9:25 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-02 14:00 ` Alex Williamson
2010-11-02 14:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-02 14:23 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2010-11-02 15:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-02 16:08 ` Alex Williamson
2010-11-02 19:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1288707790.3045.18.camel@x201 \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yamahata@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.