From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Jesse Larrew <jlarrew@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: markn@au1.ibm.com, pmac@au1.ibm.com, tbreeds@au1.ibm.com,
lkessler@us.ibm.com, mjwolf@us.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: Disable VPHN polling during a suspend operation
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:12:42 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288786362.989.66.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101029002921.17835.88560.sendpatchset@manic8ball.ltc.austin.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3361 bytes --]
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 20:30 -0400, Jesse Larrew wrote:
> From: Jesse Larrew <jlarrew@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Jesse, a few comments ...
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> index afe4aaa..1747d27 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static inline int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *bus)
> {
> return -1;
> }
> -#endif
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
Random change, though not a biggy I suppose.
> #define cpumask_of_pcibus(bus) (pcibus_to_node(bus) == -1 ? \
> cpu_all_mask : \
> @@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ extern void __init dump_numa_cpu_topology(void);
> extern int sysfs_add_device_to_node(struct sys_device *dev, int nid);
> extern void sysfs_remove_device_from_node(struct sys_device *dev, int nid);
>
> +extern int __init init_topology_update(void);
> +extern int stop_topology_update(void);
init_topology_update() is called repeatedly from post_suspend_work() so
it seems like it should be called start_topology_update(). And it can't
be __init because the suspend code is called after boot. You should get
a section mismatch warning if they are enabled.
> #else
>
> static inline void dump_numa_cpu_topology(void) {}
> @@ -107,6 +109,8 @@ static inline void sysfs_remove_device_from_node(struct sys_device *dev,
> {
> }
>
> +static int __init init_topology_update(void) {}
> +static int stop_topology_update(void) {}
That doesn't look like it compiles to me, you want static inline, and
they both return int.
> #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>
> #include <asm-generic/topology.h>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
> index 8fe8bc6..317ff2f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
> #include <asm/atomic.h>
> #include <asm/time.h>
> #include <asm/mmu.h>
> +#include <asm/topology.h>
>
> struct rtas_t rtas = {
> .lock = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED
> @@ -706,6 +707,18 @@ void rtas_os_term(char *str)
>
> static int ibm_suspend_me_token = RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE;
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES
> +static void pre_suspend_work(void)
> +{
> + stop_topology_update();
> + return;
> +}
> +
> +static void post_suspend_work(void)
> +{
> + init_topology_update();
> + return;
> +}
I'm not sure if it's worth splitting these out into "generic"
callbacks ..
> static int __rtas_suspend_last_cpu(struct rtas_suspend_me_data *data, int wake_when_done)
> {
> u16 slb_size = mmu_slb_size;
> @@ -713,6 +726,7 @@ static int __rtas_suspend_last_cpu(struct rtas_suspend_me_data *data, int wake_w
> int cpu;
>
> slb_set_size(SLB_MIN_SIZE);
> + pre_suspend_work();
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling ibm,suspend-me on cpu %i\n", smp_processor_id());
>
> while (rc == H_MULTI_THREADS_ACTIVE && !atomic_read(&data->done) &&
And isn't there an error case here where you're not re-enabling the
polling? See eg. the slb_set_size() call.
> @@ -728,6 +742,7 @@ static int __rtas_suspend_last_cpu(struct rtas_suspend_me_data *data, int wake_w
> rc = atomic_read(&data->error);
>
> atomic_set(&data->error, rc);
> + post_suspend_work();
>
> if (wake_when_done) {
> atomic_set(&data->done, 1);
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-03 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-29 0:27 [PATCH 0/3][RFC][REPOST] Add Support for Virtual Processor Home Node (VPHN) Jesse Larrew
2010-10-29 0:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Add VPHN firmware feature Jesse Larrew
2010-10-29 0:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: Disable VPHN polling during a suspend operation Jesse Larrew
2010-11-03 12:12 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2010-11-05 20:33 ` Jesse Larrew
2010-10-29 0:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: Poll VPA for topology changes and update NUMA maps Jesse Larrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1288786362.989.66.camel@concordia \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=jlarrew@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkessler@us.ibm.com \
--cc=markn@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=mjwolf@us.ibm.com \
--cc=pmac@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=tbreeds@au1.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.