From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from 64.mail-out.ovh.net (64.mail-out.ovh.net [91.121.185.65]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 23:43:14 +0100 (CET) From: Jean-Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pour=E9?= - GOOZE In-Reply-To: References: <1288808772.11023.5.camel@acer> <20101103223431.GA20934@tansi.org> <1288848713.3936.2.camel@acer> <1288964932.31820.3.camel@etppc09.garching.physik.uni-muenchen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 19:16:25 +0100 Message-ID: <1289067385.32121.1.camel@acer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Feitian PKI donation to dm-crypt projetc Reply-To: jmpoure@gooze.eu List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de Le vendredi 05 novembre 2010 à 17:29 +0100, Ma Begaj a écrit : > A script on a encrypted root partition could compare (upon decryption) > md5 > checksum of initramfs with the saved md5 checksum (with md5sum) and > show > alert message if sums do not match. When using smartcards, secrets are not displayed. So why should we need to crypt the initramfs at first stage? We only need to boot in first stage, non-encrypted, and then request secrets from PKCS#11 and uncrypt the complete system. What do you think? -- Jean-Michel Pouré - Gooze - http://www.gooze.eu