From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] dio: scale unaligned IO tracking via multiple lists
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:40:22 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289202023-15102-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289202023-15102-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
To avoid concerns that a single list and lock tracking the unaligned
IOs will not scale appropriately, create multiple lists and locks
and chose them by hashing the unaligned block being zeroed.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
fs/direct-io.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
index 1a69efd..353ac52 100644
--- a/fs/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/direct-io.c
@@ -152,8 +152,28 @@ struct dio_zero_block {
atomic_t ref; /* reference count */
};
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dio_zero_block_lock);
-static LIST_HEAD(dio_zero_block_list);
+#define DIO_ZERO_BLOCK_NR 37LL
+struct dio_zero_block_head {
+ struct list_head list;
+ spinlock_t lock;
+};
+
+static struct dio_zero_block_head dio_zero_blocks[DIO_ZERO_BLOCK_NR];
+#define to_dio_zero_head(zb) (&dio_zero_blocks[zb % DIO_ZERO_BLOCK_NR])
+
+
+static int __init
+dio_init_zero_block(void)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < DIO_ZERO_BLOCK_NR; i++) {
+ spin_lock_init(&dio_zero_blocks[i].lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dio_zero_blocks[i].list);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+subsys_initcall(dio_init_zero_block);
/*
* Add a filesystem block to the list of blocks we are tracking.
@@ -161,6 +181,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(dio_zero_block_list);
static void
dio_start_zero_block(struct dio *dio, sector_t zero_block)
{
+ struct dio_zero_block_head *zbh = to_dio_zero_head(zero_block);
struct dio_zero_block *zb;
zb = kmalloc(sizeof(*zb), GFP_NOIO);
@@ -172,9 +193,9 @@ dio_start_zero_block(struct dio *dio, sector_t zero_block)
zb->dio = dio;
atomic_set(&zb->ref, 1);
- spin_lock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
- list_add(&zb->dio_list, &dio_zero_block_list);
- spin_unlock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
+ spin_lock(&zbh->lock);
+ list_add(&zb->dio_list, &zbh->list);
+ spin_unlock(&zbh->lock);
}
static void
@@ -193,21 +214,22 @@ dio_drop_zero_block(struct dio_zero_block *zb)
static int
dio_wait_zero_block(struct dio *dio, sector_t zero_block)
{
+ struct dio_zero_block_head *zbh = to_dio_zero_head(zero_block);
struct dio_zero_block *zb;
- spin_lock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(zb, &dio_zero_block_list, dio_list) {
+ spin_lock(&zbh->lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(zb, &zbh->list, dio_list) {
if (zb->dio->inode != dio->inode)
continue;
if (zb->zero_block != zero_block)
continue;
atomic_inc(&zb->ref);
- spin_unlock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&zbh->lock);
wait_event(zb->wq, (list_empty(&zb->dio_list)));
dio_drop_zero_block(zb);
return 1;
}
- spin_unlock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&zbh->lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -216,21 +238,22 @@ dio_wait_zero_block(struct dio *dio, sector_t zero_block)
*/
static void dio_end_zero_block(struct dio *dio, sector_t zero_block)
{
+ struct dio_zero_block_head *zbh = to_dio_zero_head(zero_block);
struct dio_zero_block *zb;
- spin_lock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(zb, &dio_zero_block_list, dio_list) {
+ spin_lock(&zbh->lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(zb, &zbh->list, dio_list) {
if (zb->dio->inode != dio->inode)
continue;
if (zb->zero_block != zero_block)
continue;
list_del_init(&zb->dio_list);
- spin_unlock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&zbh->lock);
wake_up(&zb->wq);
dio_drop_zero_block(zb);
return;
}
- spin_unlock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&zbh->lock);
}
/*
--
1.7.2.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-08 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-08 7:40 [REPOST, PATCH 0/3] dio: serialise unaligned direct IO Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 7:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] dio: track and " Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 15:28 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-11-08 22:55 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 7:40 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-11-08 15:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] dio: scale unaligned IO tracking via multiple lists Jeff Moyer
2010-11-08 23:12 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-09 21:04 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-11-09 23:06 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-11 15:32 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-11-08 7:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] dio: add a mempool for the unaligned block structures Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 15:40 ` Jeff Moyer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-03 7:23 [PATCH 0/3] dio: serialise unaligned direct IO V3 Dave Chinner
2010-08-03 7:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] dio: scale unaligned IO tracking via multiple lists Dave Chinner
2010-08-03 7:23 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289202023-15102-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.