From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
Received: from tim.rpsys.net (93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk
	[93.97.173.237])
	by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699204C80815
	for <yocto@yoctoproject.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 04:02:19 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAAA2FOw000406;
	Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:02:15 GMT
Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with LMTP
	id 32627-04; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:02:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAAA20Bo000399
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:02:04 GMT
From: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
To: Esben Haabendal <eha@dev.doredevelopment.dk>
In-Reply-To: <87fwv9mrr6.fsf@eha.doredevelopment.dk>
References: <731F6F755F547148839CA39AD8282CE38F8C85@orsmsx001.amr.corp.intel.com>
	<87fwv9mrr6.fsf@eha.doredevelopment.dk>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:01:57 +0800
Message-ID: <1289383317.1272.104.camel@rex>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net
Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: Distro 1.0 Planning minutes
X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto <yocto.yoctoproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/options/yocto>,
	<mailto:yocto-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto>
List-Post: <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yocto-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto>,
	<mailto:yocto-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:02:19 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 10:50 +0100, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> "Kamble, Nitin A" <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> writes:
> 
> > Dongxiao:  sysroot per machine per recipe
> 
> Is it possible to elaborate on this topic?  What was discussed and what
> was the conclusion?

This is what we discussed in person in Cambridge, the idea of making it
possible to have one sysroot per machine or one sysroot per recipe. Our
intention is to make this work in the next few months.

I pointed you at the existing task based sstate code which should make
this kind of thing relatively straight forward.

Cheers,

Richard