Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] perf stat: Use event group to simulate PMI on PMI-less hardware counter

[Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>]

On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 20:21 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 14:15 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> > Some hardware counters(for example, Intel RAPL) can't generate interrupt
> > when overflow. So we need to simulate the interrupt to periodically
> > record the counter values. Otherwise, the counter may overflow and the
> > wrong value is read.
> > 
> > This patch uses event group to simulate PMI as suggested by Peter
> > Zijlstra, http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128220854801819&w=2
> > 
> > create_group_counters() will create a group with 2 events, one hrtimer
> > based event as the group leader, and the other event to count. The
> > hrtimer is fired periodically, so the sibling event can record its
> > counter value periodically as well.
> 
> I'm terribly confused here....
> 
>  - you introduce perf_event_attr:pmi_simulate, but then you never
> implement it -- nor do we need it afaict.

Someone need to simluate pmi will use it in future.

> 
> 
>  - you use grouped counters for perf-stat, perf-stat doesn't use
> sampling so I don't see a need to group events to simulate the PMI.
> 

Aha, sorry, actually, I mean to periodically read the PMI-less counter
and reset it to zero each time to avoid overflow.

Well, seems I have done this in the wrong way.
Let me re-think about it.