From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755554Ab0KJScS (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:32:18 -0500 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:41468 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755351Ab0KJScR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:32:17 -0500 Subject: RE: [RFC/Requirements/Design] h/w error reporting From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Luck, Tony" Cc: Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Huang, Ying" , "bp@alien8.de" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "mchehab@redhat.com" , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Arjan van de Ven , Mathieu Desnoyers In-Reply-To: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301649A6F7B@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <4cd9edd7543527b78@agluck-desktop.sc.intel.com> <20101110101450.GA18481@elte.hu> <1289400056.12418.139.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1289400234.2191.129.camel@laptop> <1289401781.12418.145.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1289403019.2084.17.camel@laptop> <20101110174852.GB4001@elte.hu> <1289412329.12418.177.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301649A6F7B@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:31:56 +0100 Message-ID: <1289413916.2084.30.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 10:23 -0800, Luck, Tony wrote: > > A few of things that pop up quickly are: > > > > 1) lockless > > This is a clear requirement for use in h/w error > reporting too. Taking locks in NMI or machine > check handler isn't an option. Don't worry, lots of PMIs are NMIs, perf needs to be fully NMI safe otherwise things simply don't work.