From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755869Ab0KKTdf (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:33:35 -0500 Received: from ms01.sssup.it ([193.205.80.99]:52728 "EHLO sssup.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755208Ab0KKTde (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:33:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/22] sched: add a syscall to wait for the next instance From: Raistlin To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , Chris Friesen , oleg@redhat.com, Frederic Weisbecker , Darren Hart , Johan Eker , "p.faure" , linux-kernel , Claudio Scordino , michael trimarchi , Fabio Checconi , Tommaso Cucinotta , Juri Lelli , Nicola Manica , Luca Abeni , Dhaval Giani , Harald Gustafsson , paulmck In-Reply-To: <1289503317.2084.158.camel@laptop> References: <1288333128.8661.137.camel@Palantir> <1288334104.8661.151.camel@Palantir> <1289503317.2084.158.camel@laptop> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-SLVdGm0ARJW/GLNp6UxW" Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:33:24 +0100 Message-ID: <1289504004.6525.109.camel@Palantir> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-SLVdGm0ARJW/GLNp6UxW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 20:21 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 08:35 +0200, Raistlin wrote: > >=20 > > Introduce sched_wait_interval() syscall (and scheduling class > > interface call). In general, this aims at providing each scheduling > > class with a mean of making one of its own task sleep for some time > > according to some specific rule of the scheduling class itself. > >=20 > Did we have an actual use case for this? I seem to remember that the > last time we seemed to thing job wakeups are due to external events, in > which case we don't need this. >=20 Might find out something, but I mostly agree with what you're saying. > I think we should try without this patch first and only consider this > once we merged the base functionality and have a solid use-case for > this. > Consider it as already dropped! :-) Thanks, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, ReTiS Lab, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa (Italy) http://blog.linux.it/raistlin / raistlin@ekiga.net / dario.faggioli@jabber.org --=-SLVdGm0ARJW/GLNp6UxW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkzcRQQACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTD5ACcC2KQLblKSsVkkvNsD7rvsUci P+IAoKia3Hg1k2QQwXksFZyYYySeZ1a7 =s4rS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SLVdGm0ARJW/GLNp6UxW--