From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:52459 "EHLO
	sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756851Ab0KKVHg (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:07:36 -0500
Subject: Re: Overload Probe Request to send data
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Cassiano Tartari <cassianotartari@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikL5VCadteiDCfDeA5VL8kdofM1rN1gBKmUbG9O@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinDJxnMHEbQjUwWjT2MnW5r7gcxoZW7bZetT7a9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1289497988.3695.3.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
	 <AANLkTikL5VCadteiDCfDeA5VL8kdofM1rN1gBKmUbG9O@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:08:58 -0800
Message-ID: <1289509738.3695.7.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 17:18 -0200, Cassiano Tartari wrote:
> Sorry johannes, but I didn't understand what you said.
> 
> I need to send data without confiability, just in one way client->AP
> and without association, and this information is too short.

Oh ... and why not use vendor specific public action frames?

johannes